Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Humbug (RIP) said to Thracks once that AMD should lock Nvidia out of TressFX and his reply is below.
Not really the best screenshots to band about to make a point thoseeing as theres so many factual errors in the quotes
(even if that is arbitary to the attitude point).
What? RIP? plz explain Matt
Banned for three months. Back in a week or two as far as i know.![]()
No offence Roffles but I'll take his word over yours.![]()
Just in time to gloat over the new cards and get banned again![]()
Sorry but even very simple googling will show you hes wrong, very very wrong. Don't take my word for it it won't take you 5 seconds to find out for yourself.
Banned for three months. Back in a week or two as far as i know.![]()
What the heck did he do to earn a ban? been wondering why i havent seen him post in a while.
What the heck did he do to earn a ban? been wondering why i havent seen him post in a while.
Few of them got into a very stupid argument and wouldn't give up iirc.
Every time i talk about it i get in trouble. Don't lead me down that path again man.
(trust)
No benefit running Physics on GPU
It does look cool though. without the smoke it looked bland.
You know it. here we go again![]()
Sure thing, AMD.
+1
ordered my second gtx 770 lightning today....cant wait to play this batman in sli in 3d.
Same as the last then, some steam/smoke and paper that moves around, you can't honestly tell me that couldn't have been implemented for everyone? Its hardly ground breaking physics.
I'll try it when I get the game but it just seems a little shallow to be boasting about imo.
Most games sporting some sort of gimmicky or fancy physics are physX based but only because nVidia has been quick to offer the devs the kit not because there isnt anything as good out there. If we look at borderlands 2 we all see a mess of a physx title that is extremely picky about what setup it wants to run well or okayish on and which it dont with no regard to high end products (im talking strictly nvidia setup here not hybrids)Possibly, but who is everyone? Regardless of it being ground breaking it's a technology that allows for some decent effects. I don't see any games with similar real time physics without PhysX?
Actually if you look at latest Havok engine and what it can do using only the CPU and with a proper dev behind the coding it does make stuff like physx look like a joke due to the hugh difference in resource requirements between the two while being able to do the same. Now im not saying the AMD guy is right that there is no point but i would argue that at this point in time there is no need.Sure thing, AMD.