Metro 6R4 (look-a-like) on ebay

Wikipedia said:
It was powered by a David Wood designed bespoke 3-litre V6 powerplant which used some of the engine architecture of the Cosworth DFV. It featured twin overhead camshafts and four valves per cylinder

It looks nothing like a Rover V8, and I think the response from the eBay seller was expected. No one is ever going to believe that it is real anyway.
 
I'd heard that the prototype engine was a cut down V8 in the very very begining but it was a bespoke one in the end that ended up being turbo'd for the XJ220?
 
As Alan Partridge would say..."I'm not driving a mini metro.....I'm not driving a mini metro......I'm not driving a mini metro".
 
So point me in the direction of a good source that confirms this? So did these welders magic in four valve heads too?

6R4
Bore: 92mm, Stroke: 75mm

Rover 3.5 V8 (if thats the V8 they used)
bore 88.9 mm, stroke 71.0 mm

Bore spacing would be interesting to find out

It was not a cut down Rover V8, it was a bespoke design.

From here, first source I found withing 10 seconds of looking: http://www.6r4.net/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=4

Having rejected the Honda V6 (Austin Rover then shared a great deal of engineering development with the Japanese manufacturer), the only other obvious solution would be their own tried & tested 3.5 litre Rover (formerly Buick) V8 engine. Being that bit too bulky to fit in the back of the Metro, the decision was taken to cut out two cylinders and (literally!) weld it back together - hey presto, a 2.5 litre Rover V6! Fitted with a purpose made crank, Rover Vitesse racing internals and Weber carburettors it produced a healthy 250bhp - ideal to test the car until the final engine was ready.


I have read the rest, as I was going from memory as I already said. Once again, going from memory, I think the 250bhp models were the club models, and the 400+ bhp were the works versions.

I'd heard that the prototype engine was a cut down V8 in the very very begining but it was a bespoke one in the end that ended up being turbo'd for the XJ220?

Pretty sure they made a purpose made block soon after.

I laughed at the response I got, as some ways he's right :-D Why should I stick my nose in when I see something I think may be misleading/dishonest.
 
Sounds like rubbish given the 6R4 had a 3l engine. Different bore and stroke too. Maybe they chopped about a V8 to use as a dummy engine to build the car around but that's irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
As Alan Partridge would say..."I'm not driving a mini metro.....I'm not driving a mini metro......I'm not driving a mini metro".

:D

They've rebadged it, you fool!

Also, seems like other than the title, which was designed to get attention, the advert was straightforward.
 
From here, first source I found withing 10 seconds of looking: http://www.6r4.net/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=4

Having rejected the Honda V6 (Austin Rover then shared a great deal of engineering development with the Japanese manufacturer), the only other obvious solution would be their own tried & tested 3.5 litre Rover (formerly Buick) V8 engine. Being that bit too bulky to fit in the back of the Metro, the decision was taken to cut out two cylinders and (literally!) weld it back together - hey presto, a 2.5 litre Rover V6! Fitted with a purpose made crank, Rover Vitesse racing internals and Weber carburettors it produced a healthy 250bhp - ideal to test the car until the final engine was ready.


I have read the rest, as I was going from memory as I already said. Once again, going from memory, I think the 250bhp models were the club models, and the 400+ bhp were the works versions.



Pretty sure they made a purpose made block soon after.

I laughed at the response I got, as some ways he's right :-D Why should I stick my nose in when I see something I think may be misleading/dishonest.

The test car was nothing like the end car. Both Clubman and Works cars ran the same engine with different settings, Group B demanded all the cars had to be the same. The 200 cars were NOT fitted with a Rover V8 with 2 cylinders cut off, it is a myth and it is wrong.
 
£16k back in 1986 or whatever would have been a lot of money though. I remember reading the RS200s were sold off silly cheap too

Not really it wasn't. For context my father paid £15K for his SD1 Rover Vitesse in 1983, so in relative terms they were a steal as you could get them for closer to £12K as I recall and the RS200's were a bit more I think but still incredibly cheap. I used to drive past the Reliant factory in Tamworth often and remember seeing them all lined up coming off the lines there.

There are many stories about numbers too, how Ford 'might' have used different number badges on the same car when FISA came to have a nose at the 200 production run, sort of wheeling the car around back, putting on a different plaque and bringing it around front again.
 
Wow... 6R4 and RS200 together :-D Awesome. (I've always wanted a ride in an RS200... such a beast).

Ive been in the RS200 but not the 6R4 as it has no MOT due to emissions (it's running mad octane petrol so needs to use it all first as it's mad money!). He also has other rally cars, these are just the Group B's he has so far.
 
tbh its pretty easy to understand what it is and if people think its real for 3500 then they deserve to be scammed :p .
 
Back
Top Bottom