Madeleine McCann's parents

Django x2 · 15 Oct 2013 at 15:54

feedtheram said:
The Wiki article seems to dispute this claim...

"A complex LCN [low copy number] DNA result which appeared to have originated from at least three people was obtained from cellular material recovered from the luggage compartment section ... Within the DNA profile of Madeleine McCann there are 20 DNA components represented by 19 peaks on a chart. ... Of these 19 components 15 are present within the result from this item; there are 37 components in total. There are 37 components because there are at least 3 contributors; but there could be up to five contributors. In my opinion therefore this result is too complex for meaningful interpretation/inclusion. ... The individual components in Madeleine's profile are not unique to her; it is the specific combination of 19 components that makes her profile unique above all others. Elements of Madeleine's profile are also present within the profiles of many of the scientists here in Birmingham, myself included. It's important to stress that 50% of Madeleine's profile will be shared with each parent. It is not possible, in a mixture of more than two people, to determine or evaluate which specific DNA components pair with each other. ... Therefore, we cannot answer the question: Is the match genuine, or is it a chance match"

Doesn't seem to dispute it, just seems to clarify that, without all 19 markers, there is a chance that they do not all belong to Maddy. That chance? 1 in 1000, apparently.

Trig · 15 Oct 2013 at 15:56

foster grant said:
yep .

but they did this at least 5 nights in a row , even though the night before she went missing ...that little girl had been heard calling out " Daddy daddy " for over an hour .

Never read before that it was for over an hour, heard them say yesterday on the TV that the kids had woken up but didnt hear a time frame for that...

foster grant · 15 Oct 2013 at 15:57

This has made for some good reading....but im off to play BF3

Adam_101 · 15 Oct 2013 at 15:57

Castiel said:
My views on the McCanns would not bear repeating on a public forum.

+1

Xordium · 15 Oct 2013 at 15:57

Django x2 said:
That chance? 1 in 1000, apparently.

Now I am hardly in their fanclub but that is plain wrong.

Django x2 · 15 Oct 2013 at 15:59

Xordium said:
Now I am hardly in their fanclub but that is plain wrong.

As I say, apparently...

To find 15 out of Madeleine’s 19 markers present means that the chances that the traces of blood in the hired car came from anyone other than Madeleine were fewer than only 1 in 1,000.

Django x2 · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:00

Sadly, this isn't a 9/11 conspiracy theory, the evidence against the Mcanns is overwhelmingly compelling

Uther · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:02

Django x2 said:
Sadly, this isn't a 9/11 conspiracy theory, the evidence against the Mcanns is overwhelmingly compelling

But, at this point, if the CPS suddenly decided to act, how could they possibly get a fair trial? With all the media speculation over the years it would be very difficult I think.

deuse · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:03

Django x2 said:
Sadly, this isn't a 9/11 conspiracy theory, the evidence against the Mcanns is overwhelmingly compelling in my opinion only, I have no fact to back it up

wildman · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:05

Uther said:
But, at this point, if the CPS suddenly decided to act, how could they possibly get a fair trial? With all the media speculation over the years it would be very difficult I think.

which is exactly the game they have been playing. They know what happened, they know what they have done, so they brought the mnedia circus into town and can cry mis-trial at any point they feel its going against them if the CPS were to file.

Like I said before, everyone has been mugged off by these con artists.

MooMoo444 · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:09

They killed the girl and have made rich from the story. No justice in the world.

feedtheram · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:16

Django x2 said:
Doesn't seem to dispute it, just seems to clarify that, without all 19 markers, there is a chance that they do not all belong to Maddy. That chance? 1 in 1000, apparently.

It states 15 out of Maddys 19 were found but the total amount of markers was in the 30's. I don't know if this means 99.9 percent but if it was i would imagine the British forensic team would not have described it as "too complex for meaningful interpretation".

If it truly is 99.9% accurate then i can't believe the police would have dropped that line of inquiry.

feedtheram · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:24

Django x2 said:
Sadly, this isn't a 9/11 conspiracy theory, the evidence against the Mcanns is overwhelmingly compelling

I would suggest it is more likely the Portuguese police department manufactured a smear campaign against the McCanns to take the heat away from their balls up of an investigation and reduce the impact on tourism in the area.

wildman · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:30

feedtheram said:
I would suggest it is more likely the Portuguese police department manufactured a smear campaign against the McCanns to take the heat away from their balls up of an investigation and reduce the impact on tourism in the area.

or her parents are lying scumbags who courted the media for their own ends, got a sledge load of taxpayers money and will never come out with the truth on what actually happened.

what makes your story more believable than mine ? A couple of con artist acting for the cameras ?????

They should take their arses out of the public eye and fund the investigation themselves if they were that distraught, but they seem rather intent on miling the public purse. This stinks to high heaven. They were bad parents and we the tax payers are getting mugged off for the bill.

Suarez7 · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:32

I have a feeling I'll visit this forum in 50 years time and this thread will still be active.

Django x2 · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:34

You believe I am the only person with this opinion?? Deluded much?

feedtheram · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:48

Django x2 said:
You believe I am the only person with this opinion?? Deluded much?

Plenty of people deny the moon landings.

I just don't share your opinion and dispute the evidence that you claim exists. You may be correct, but you seem to be 100% convinced and i'm not sure how you can be in this instance.

feedtheram · 15 Oct 2013 at 16:52

wildman said:
what makes your story more believable than mine ? A couple of con artist acting for the cameras ?????

You may be correct. I am disputing the 'evidence'. To me it just seems more likely that they are telling the truth than lying given the facts as i have interpreted them. Others can interpret them in a different way which i do not have a problem with.

I cannot be 100% sure either way, but it annoys me when people make statements claiming to be 100% sure based on what they have read in tabloids or conspiracy theory websites.

foster grant · 15 Oct 2013 at 17:07

they are telling the truth ???

they lied about the window....they lied about the door , they lied about their child's sleeping patten , they lied about the times .

that's not the truth at all is it ?

wildman · 15 Oct 2013 at 17:12

feedtheram said:
You may be correct. I am disputing the 'evidence'. To me it just seems more likely that they are telling the truth than lying given the facts as i have interpreted them. Others can interpret them in a different way which i do not have a problem with.

I cannot be 100% sure either way, but it annoys me when people make statements claiming to be 100% sure based on what they have read in tabloids or conspiracy theory websites.

so you think its more liekly they are telling the truth, I say its more likely they are lying and have already shown previous form for lying about facts........