I'm really impressed with you lot

bikerchris · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:48

You don't need to hear this, but the quality of written English around these parts is excellent. May be I've been typing on the wrong forums, but it's so nice to read legible sentences with ease.

So thanks!

Jegethy · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:51

Your welcum.

Stuff · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:51

bikerchris · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:52

Jegethy said:
Your welcum.

And that's what I like too - the 'uuuuumour

Rroff · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:52

Wouldn't say its excellent (not that I can talk) but I do notice the average level of written English on these boards is way above most other places I visit regularly.

Sliver · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:53

I ar with smiles now.

iamdjdz · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:54

You get blocked and or ridiculed if you use poor written English or text speak, it makes for a better place!

DirtyJester · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:54

Chris, I'm not impressed with your sig...

Disco Boy · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:56

bikerchris said:
You don't need to hear this, but the quality of written English around these parts is excellent. May be I've been typing on the wrong forums, but it's so nice to read legible sentences with ease.

So thanks!

Sites generally fall into one of two categories:
1) People using, or trying to use, correct English.
2) Halfwits communicating in txt spk m8.

Thankfully, OcUK falls into the former category. Sites which fall into the latter category are unbearable.

Merlin5 · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:58

It's ok until the "would have" and "usually always" brigade bring the standard back down.

mame · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:58

fanks. their are place's that are''''nt as good as ear.

Lysander · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:59

bikerchris said:
May be

*maybe

Monkeynut · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:59

Shame that 'oooop norf we don't talk as clearly as we type.

Jegethy · 20 Oct 2013 at 23:59

Disco Boy said:
Sites generally fall into one of two categories:
1) People using, or trying to use, correct English.
2) Halfwits communicating in txt spk m8.

Thankfully, OcUK falls into the former category. Sites which fall into the latter category are unbearable.

Indeed. OcUK is pretty much the only forum I frequent because of that reason.

Disco Boy · 21 Oct 2013 at 00:02

Merlin5 said:
It's ok until the "would have" and "usually always" brigade bring the standard back down.

Your right!

Your/you're is the third most annoying thing after "would have" and "brought" instead of "bought."

bledd · 21 Oct 2013 at 00:03

Was about to say about your sig, it's too big. 400x75 is the limit @ 20kb

Welcome to the forums

arknor · 21 Oct 2013 at 00:04

Disco Boy said:
Sites generally fall into one of two categories:
1) People using, or trying to use, correct English.
2) Halfwits communicating in txt spk m8.

Thankfully, OcUK falls into the former category. Sites which fall into the latter category are unbearable.

1) Forums without tapatalk.
2)Forums with tapatalk

Zero Pope · 21 Oct 2013 at 00:06

Disco Boy said:
1) People using, or trying to use, correct English.

I will quite happily admit, this forum has gotten me into the habit of typing correctly, rescuing me from the slippery slopes of txt spk. :cool:

mame · 21 Oct 2013 at 00:06

Was about to say about you're sig, its to big. 400x75 is the limit @ 20kb

Welcome too the forum's

bikerchris · 21 Oct 2013 at 00:08

Crums you lot are quick...I think I'll just say thanks and yes in response to so many responses, yarp

Also, sig is now corrected for the fourth time...MAY.....BE, Lysander

Additional: I did read them all though, made I chuckle!

I'm really impressed with you lot

Capodecina