Australian bushfires

Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
32,974
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
It's bushfire season already.

Hundreds of homes have been lost in NSW. Thousands of hectares of bushland are now smoking ashes. An area larger than Hong Kong has been completely destroyed. Amateur photographers have provided some powerful images:

800072_08a77fd6_39ea_11e3_9bcd_10262b6f8853.jpg


800126_03999c86_39ea_11e3_9bcd_10262b6f8853.jpg


800226_09a644c6_39ea_11e3_9bcd_10262b6f8853.jpg


See also the photo gallery here.

The NSW Rural Fire Service—staffed almost entirely by volunteers—has worked 24/7 to bring some of the worst fires under control. With 70,000 members, it is believed to be the world's largest volunteer fire service. The community's appreciation for their sacrifice is clearly reflected in this comment from a local RFS firefighter:

As a firie living in the mountains, it is getting harder and harder to spend money.

Seriously, recent examples... went to McDonalds "no charge to you sir", local cafe for a coffee "free for the firies mate", grab a six pack at the bottle shop "that's on us tonight mate", grab a couple of pies at a local bakery "no charge", go to the local IGA to grab a bag of trail mix and some batteries etc and just get waved through the checkouts by the manager..

It is actually getting a little embarrassing, I am starting to drop money into donation tins if they are sitting on counters whenever I get a freebie.

I'll let this video tell the rest of the story:

 
Last edited:
Yeah, the images are heartbreaking. That video almost had me in tears.

Some of my mates have been forced to evacuate, but as far as I'm aware they haven't suffered any loss.
 
I hope no one you know is affected by it too severely. :(

I have family in Sydney and my other half has family in the Blue Mountains that have had to be evacuated. We still don't know whether or not they'll go back to their homes at all. It's really sad to see such devastation.
 
Yeah been paying attention to whats going ok. Up until 6 months ago I worked for DEC in WA and had a role to play in bushfire response, also was part of the Fire Management group, scary stuff the firefighters get involved with, deadly sometimes too :(
 
Last edited:
My sister is currently working in a salvation army call centre, apparently they are drafting in friends and family go take calls as they are so inundated with donations at the moment. She also said last night she was quite affected by a call from someone asking for help getting furnature, her house burnt down and she lost everything.

On the devastation side it's not as bad as it looks is it? Australia's bushland is supposed to regenerate through fire AFAIK, the only problem is the houses gone up in smoke, I'm sure nature will return stronger than ever.

http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/[email protected]/0/6C98BB75496A5AD1CA2569DE00267E48

Fire Ecology

Eucalypts appeared in the fossil record around 80 million years ago. With them were charcoal fragments, and indication of the long association of fire with Australian flora. Although there have been substantial changes in the vegetation associated with change in climate, the fossil record shows that whenever there was a change to a drier environment with associated sclerophyll vegetation, there is also an increase in the frequency of fire. For example, in the Lake George area of New South Wales, whenever there was a shift from plants favoured by a cool temperate climate to plants which were favoured by a dry arid climate (for example, the eucalypts), there was an increase in charcoal associated with the plant pollen. There was a substantial increase in the amount of charcoal present between 200,000 and 250,000 years before present which is well before Aborigines were considered to be within the area. Since then, the presence of natural ignition from lightning and the extensive burning practices of the Aborigines have influenced the development of our forests and heathlands and resulted in a natural mosaic of plant community ages throughout Australia.

Although wildfire is detrimental to our rural production and the built environment, it should be considered to be as much a part of the natural environmental of our forests and heathland ecosystems as the sun and the rain. Some Australian plants are stimulated to flower by the presence of fire or smoke, while others have seeds which require some heat treatment before they will germinate. There is a suite of specific plants and animals which are associated with each fire regime. Annual burning favours communities of grasses and herbs, which in turn are preferred by kangaroos and larger wallabies. The tall eucalypts of the mountain forests of Victoria and Tasmania have seeds which are so small that they will not survive in the deep litter beds that accumulate beneath them. These species require an intense fire under dry conditions to remove the accumulated organic matter on the forest floor so that the tiny eucalypt seedlings can grow and regenerate the forests. If these forests do not receive a fire within their life span, (which is about 250 to 350 years), they will die out and be replaced by temperate rainforest species. In between these two extremes are other plants which have the capacity to produce abundant shoots from stems or lignotubers after fire and so can withstand frequent and repeated firing at regular intervals.

Similarly, some species of our native fauna are favoured by burning at regular intervals, others prefer intermediate intervals between fire, while yet others require long periods without fire for their optimum development. When considering fire in relation to fauna, it is important not to confuse temporary impacts on individual animals with longer term trends which often have a net beneficial effect. During any fire some animals will perish. However, in the absence of fire, changes in vegetation may cause the decline and disappearance of some species. The interdependence of plants and animals with a particular fire frequency can be quite complex. For example, the small rat kangaroo or woylie of Western Australia has a diet which consists mainly of the underground fruiting bodies of a fungus. The fruiting of the fungus is related to the amount of nitrogen in the soil which is, in turn, related to the vigour of understorey plants which are capable of fixing nitrogen. Thus, the optimum conditions for this animal requires a fire frequency which regenerates the understorey shrubs (in the absence of fire the shrubs die out) and yet provides other areas where the shrubs are intact with shelter from predators.

Introduced animals have had a huge impact on the smaller native fauna whose interaction with fire is complicated further by the grazing of native vegetation by rabbits and the predation by foxes and feral cats. It is considered by many that these influences are having a much greater impact on our fauna than the changed frequency of fire.

Nature will be fine, people will just need to rebuild their houses.
 
Last edited:
On the devastation side it's not as bad as it looks is it? Australia's bushland is supposed to regenerate through fire AFAIK, the only problem is the houses gone up in smoke, I'm sure nature will return stronger than ever.

That is true to a point, but a lot of animals will be killed and/or displaced, which is not good for the ecology.

The bushland itself will recover well enough. The animals and humans won't. Many people will be left with psychological scars.
 
Most of my family live around Sydney.

The last I heard the were four fire engines at the end of one of my cousins' street and they had just about managed to stop the fire getting any closer.

Some of their neighbours have lost their houses though. :(
 
This helmet cam footage from the current fires will give you some idea of the dangers involved:


Imagine trying to save lives under those conditions.

Note that when the firefighter reaches the white car, the fire is still a good distance away. There are no flames; just a wall of smoke. By the time he's turned back to check—less than 20 seconds later—the fire has reached the car and flames are licking the bonnet.

That's how fast it moves.
 
That is true to a point, but a lot of animals will be killed and/or displaced, which is not good for the ecology.

The bushland itself will recover well enough. The animals and humans won't. Many people will be left with psychological scars.

Non humans won't have a problem (except possibly invasive species), there may be a short term reduction in population but in the long run it creates the environment plenty need (have a read of the quote/link that illustrates the point).

Humans are another point, but then we'd be classed as the invasive species in all this unfortunately. No fires would have a devastating impact on the Australian ecosystem. We just need to make sure we try and protect homes, rather than stop all fires (which would be impossible anyway).

The point being although those pictures above look devastating, in fact it's a natural cycle and in a year there will be green everywhere and the bush will be thriving again.
 
Last edited:
I thought that in this instance some of the fires were caused by people not trimming back the trees from powercables? There was an instruction to do it and some people didn't bother? Well that's one of the stories I've heard anyway.
 
Non humans won't have a problem (except possibly invasive species), there may be a short term reduction in population but in the long run it creates the environment plenty need (have a read of the quote/link that illustrates the point).

Humans are another point, but then we'd be classed as the invasive species in all this unfortunately. No fires would have a devastating impact on the Australian ecosystem. We just need to make sure we try and protect homes, rather than stop all fires (which would be impossible anyway).

The point being although those pictures above look devastating, in fact it's a natural cycle and in a year there will be green everywhere and the bush will be thriving again.

Human activity is what is causing bush fires to become a problem. More fires = more eucalyptus. It's a flammable tree ffs, it thrives on being burnt (thus killing rivals)

Building in these scrub areas is akin to building on flood plains and moaning that your house has flooded *again*. Sad for those involved non the less though :(
 
The point being although those pictures above look devastating, in fact it's a natural cycle and in a year there will be green everywhere and the bush will be thriving again.

I agree. Not much comfort to those who've lost their homes, though. And there will be a lot of infrastructure to rebuild (not just houses). Hopefully it results in tighter planning permissions.

I thought that in this instance some of the fires were caused by people not trimming back the trees from powercables? There was an instruction to do it and some people didn't bother? Well that's one of the stories I've heard anyway.

One fire was started by foliage too close to power lines, which were sparking in the heat. As I understand it, trimming trees away from power cables is primarily the council's responsibility. I'm not aware of people refusing to cut back after being instructed to do so.

Another fire was deliberately started by two small boys. It burned ~5,000 hectares.

Another was accidentally started by explosives from the Australian Defence Force during a training exercise on a live firing range. This became one of the biggest and most dangerous fires.
 
Back
Top Bottom