David Cameron makes threat to media over NSA and GCHQ leaks

Soldato
Joined
25 Jul 2010
Posts
5,342
Location
A house
David Cameron has called on the Guardian and other newspapers to show "social responsibility" in the reporting of the leaked NSA files to avoid high court injunctions or the use of D notices to prevent the publication of information that could damage national security.

In a statement to MPs on Monday about last week's European summit in Brussels, where he warned of the dangers of a "lah-di-dah, airy-fairy view" about the dangers of leaks, the prime minister said his preference was to talk to newspapers rather than resort to the courts. But he said it would be difficult to avoid acting if newspapers declined to heed government advice.

The prime minister issued the warning after the Tory MP Julian Smith quoted a report in Monday's edition of the Sun that said Britain's intelligence agencies believed details from the NSA files leaked by the US whistleblower Edward Snowden had hampered their work.

The Sun quoted a "top surveillance source" as saying that terrorists had "gone quiet" after the publication of details about NSA and GCHQ operations.

Cameron told MPs: "We have a free press, it's very important the press feels it is not pre-censored from what it writes and all the rest of it.

"The approach we have taken is to try to talk to the press and explain how damaging some of these things can be and that is why the Guardian did actually destroy some of the information and disks that they have. But they've now gone on and printed further material which is damaging.

"I don't want to have to use injunctions or D notices or the other tougher measures. I think it's much better to appeal to newspapers' sense of social responsibility. But if they don't demonstrate some social responsibility it would be very difficult for government to stand back and not to act."

The Guardian agreed to allow officials from GCHQ to oversee the destruction of hard drives in July, after the government threatened to use an injunction to block publication of information from the NSA files.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/28/david-cameron-nsa-threat-newspapers-guardian-snowden

What the hell is wrong with this country? Why are we allowing this kind of information to be blocked by the people who authorised the acts?

Why is this just going to be pushed into the closet and forgot about?

What is wrong with the British Public?
 
It's all downhill from here, western civilization has peaked.

The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been two hundred years. These nations have progressed through a nine stage sequence:

1 – From bondage to spiritual faith;
2 – from spiritual faith to great courage;
3 – from courage to liberty;
4 – from liberty to abundance;
5 – from abundance to selfishness;
6 – from selfishness to complacency;
7 – from complacence to apathy;
8 – from apathy to dependence;
9 – from dependency back again into bondage

I'd say we're at stage 7-8.
 
What the hell is wrong with this country? Why are we allowing this kind of information to be blocked by the people who authorised the acts?

Why is this just going to be pushed into the closet and forgot about?

What is wrong with the British Public?

Nothing, whatever we say it will still go ahead if they want it to. So what exactly do you want us to do? :p
 
Our Publically Accountable Govt. wants to know absolutely everything about it's Private Citizens and it wants it's Private Citizens to know absolutely nothing about it. LolBigBrother.
 
Fight for change, be an inspiration for others, to leave a future for your children.

Stand up and be counted.

O please! Did you really think the gov wasn't collecting all this information? Any government has been doing this since their creation in many different forms.

Trust me, no one cares about your emails.
 
"I don't want to have to use injunctions or D notices or the other tougher measures. I think it's much better to appeal to newspapers' sense of social responsibility. But if they don't demonstrate some social responsibility it would be very difficult for government to stand back and not to act."

What about the government's social responsibility to allow their citizens to have a private life? It goes two ways... At the moment the leaks are showing it is not going two ways, rather the government expect everything whereas the the public should just put up with infringement of civil liberties for 'the greater good'.

All this is especially important given that a lot of the leaks are showing the collection programs are bordering on illegal or just downright illegal. You can't pick and choose who can follow the law without repercussions, if you do then you should expect leaks showing your double standards and law breaking...
 
It isn't about concealing the information it is about not exposing the methods in which it was obtained.

Whaylt if the methods are the problem in the first place... It's not the information that's the problem, it's the methods. Don't use borderline illegal/immoral or just downright illegal methods and wonder why they are exposed.
 
Back
Top Bottom