British man charged with hacking US Army and Nasa computer systems

^^

Every time security precautions fail, all those responsible for maintaining it are executed. All equipment if has flaws is destroyed, and those who supplied said equipment are also killed.

Or at least this is what i would do.

you'd be constantly crippled by having no equipment and no one willing to supply it.
 
lEWt38Z.gif
 
Pity we can't charge the yanks with doing the same thing to people in Europe.

I know. If they're hacking every ones phone then no biggy, but when they get hacked everyone else is knee deep in discarded toys and upturned prams.

;)
 
Who cares?

He'll get 10years in a soft prison in the states. They won't stick him on with real cons as he'd get butt raped on a daily basis.
 
Lauri Love ? Is that a joke name or did his parents hate him from the get go ?

I think it's cool, maybe short for Laurence?

The US should give these meddling kids a job in security, every loophole they find is a slap in the face for their useless security team and one that the Chinese would have loved to have found first.

Instead we will have another pointless round of extradition, stable door shutting and legal mud slinging.
GO USA!
 
Tell that to Angela Merkel.

Some people must live in caves. :rolleyes:

Amusingly you claim I must live in a cave, yet you're insisting that phones got "hacked".

No phones got "hacked", what happened is that the voicemail inboxes were accessed due to them not being secured properly.

They were hacked just as much as sitting at someone's open, unlocked computer and going through their personal data is their computer being hacked.
 
An indictment served in a US court included pieces of instant message conversations that Love allegedly had with his partners, with one message saying: "This ... stuff is really sensitive".

Just another story desencitizing the masses to accept that private conversations are no longer actually private.
 
Amusingly you claim I must live in a cave, yet you're insisting that phones got "hacked".

No phones got "hacked", what happened is that the voicemail inboxes were accessed due to them not being secured properly.

They were hacked just as much as sitting at someone's open, unlocked computer and going through their personal data is their computer being hacked.

Exploiting unencrypted data packets isn't quite the same as sitting as someone's unlocked computer - although both the former and latter are either frowned upon or basically illegal.

However, of course, I agree with your underlying point that the tapping of Angela Merkel's phone was not "hacking".
 
Exploiting unencrypted data packets isn't quite the same as sitting as someone's unlocked computer - although both the former and latter are either frowned upon or basically illegal.

However, of course, I agree with your underlying point that the tapping of Angela Merkel's phone was not "hacking".

That's because I wasn't talking about that, that itself as you said is phone tapping.

When people refer to "phone hacking", they are usually talking about situations where a person's voicemail inbox has been accessed, and the access amounts to the example I gave, sitting at their unlocked computer and going through their data.
 
Back
Top Bottom