Britain's "horniest" student wins cash prize for bedding three new men a week

w6fa.jpg
 
I've also never understood the fascination some men have about the number of sexual partners that a woman has had. If I was going out with someone, and they had had 1, 100 or 1000 past partners it wouldn't bother me in the slightest. Providing that they were only with me if we were in an exclusive relationship.

I imagine that people who do care only care because of their own insecurity that they don't think they'll be good enough and will always be compared to someone else. It's very sad really.

Telescopi said:
Surprisingly the two people I'm least likely to agree with have been the only sensible posts in this thread. Either of them are as likely to be right but I'm disappointed with some members who should know better, sure the picture is not the best, but if she had a bit of fake tan, make up and her hair done they'd be fapping all over it on the random pics thread.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how to take this! :o I'm now intrigued to see how you view me.
 
Ahleckz said:
I've also never understood the fascination some men have about the number of sexual partners that a woman has had. If I was going out with someone, and they had had 1, 100 or 1000 past partners it wouldn't bother me in the slightest. Providing that they were only with me if we were in an exclusive relationship.

I imagine that people who do care only care because of their own insecurity that they don't think they'll be good enough and will always be compared to someone else. It's very sad really.
Click to expand...
Because lots people who are promiscuous tend to have been abused, so their ethics of sex can be a little skewed. Also people who tend to sleep around have a higher chance of carrying diseases.

So it's pretty natural behavior for people to be repulsed by them.
 
UncleRuckus said:
Because lots people who are promiscuous tend to have been abused, so their ethics of sex can be a little skewed. Also people who tend to sleep around have a higher chance of carrying diseases.

So it's pretty natural behavior for people to be repulsed by them.
Click to expand...

Any peer reviewed research to back this up?

I would be hoping that if you were to be involved in a relationship with someone then you'd both have checked yourself out and any curable ills would be sorted.
 
Ahleckz said:
Any peer reviewed research to back this up?

I would be hoping that if you were to be involved in a relationship with someone then you'd both have checked yourself out and any curable ills would be sorted.
Click to expand...
Yep sure.

THE CONSEQUENCES OF CHILDHOOD ABUSE.
Authors:
JELIC TUSCIC, Swea1 [email protected]
BULJAN FLANDER, Gordana1
MATESKOVIC, Dragana1
Source:
Pedijatrija Danas: Pediatrics Today. Jan2013, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p24-35. 12p.


Problems in the realm of sexuality
Newcomb et al. (38) emphasize that chronic
sexual abuse may biologically predispose adolescents
to early onset of puberty and lead to
problematic sexual behaviour and premature
sexual relations. In adolescents who were
sexually abused in childhood, amongst other
things, the nature of their romantic and friendship
relationships is often visibly disrupted,
often because of their feelings of guilt
and shame (38). Buljan Flander and Ćosić
(39) point out that sexually abused adolescents
often show sexualized behaviour, a
poor ability to differentiate between emotional
and sexual relationships, they may become
promiscuous, develop sexual identification
disorders, or even show phobic avoidance
of sexual stimulus, and in view of all this, are
at risk of themselves becoming perpetrators
of sexual crimes. Sexual abuse in childhood
has been shown to be the strongest predictor
of later risky sexual behaviour (40), but also a
significant predictor of violence in interpersonal
relationships (4).
Click to expand...
 
Ahleckz said:
I've also never understood the fascination some men have about the number of sexual partners that a woman has had. If I was going out with someone, and they had had 1, 100 or 1000 past partners it wouldn't bother me in the slightest. Providing that they were only with me if we were in an exclusive relationship.

I imagine that people who do care only care because of their own insecurity that they don't think they'll be good enough and will always be compared to someone else. It's very sad really.
Click to expand...

Perhaps because it suggests something about that person that I don't necessarily want in a partner? For example, if I'm after a long-term relationship and a girl tells me on the first date that I'll be 'shag #1000', that wouldn't exactly fill me with confidence about our future together.

Or, you know, because I'm incredibly insecure and I hate women who are 'sexually liberated'.
 
Ahleckz said:
Any peer reviewed research to back this up?

I would be hoping that if you were to be involved in a relationship with someone then you'd both have checked yourself out and any curable ills would be sorted.
Click to expand...

Say you have a dice where one face is marked 'HIV'

throw it once you many get lucky and it might not land on that face, throw it many times...well you get the picture.

The more sexual partners you have the more problems you invite, even condoms aren't guaranteed to work 100% of the time (due to it splitting etc)
 
MeMeMeMe said:
This is blatant nonsense. Our culture puts men in charge of sex.
Click to expand...

Don't be silly.

Men are free to sleep around without social repercussions and indeed are hailed as heroes, but women are socially punished for doing the same (for example: much of this thread).
Click to expand...
Yes, and women who do so are often referred to as "cheap". Have you really never wondered why? It's because they're seen as not making men pay enough for sex, because that undermines the idea that sex is something men must earn from women. Supply and demand...and the people who control supply are in charge.

This is because of the dated idea that women are men's property, and their sexuality needs to be controlled for the benefit of men.
Click to expand...
Your statements might make sense in feminist fantasy land propaganda, but in the real world they contradict themselves. You can't possibly think that the traditional setup was arranged for the benefit of men - no sane person could. If it was, then women would have been socialised to be much more sexual, obviously, not to suppress their sexuality and to withold sex in order to increase the price by reducing supply.

Regarding your comments about feminsim, masculism (chuckle), and equality: you simply don't know what you're talking about. Feminism would eliminate this double standard, and bring about equality.
Click to expand...
You are a liar or you are deluded. In other words, you are a feminist.

Sexism does not bring about sexual equality. It just brings about more sexism.

You're making obviously wrong statements that contradict both themselves and reality and you're chuckling because of your own ignorance. You know only the silly propaganda of your bigoted ideology.

I hope you gain more knowledge and wisdom in time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom