http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatsp...business-outperforms-pcs-for-various-reasons/
Love them or hate them, they know their business.
And in other news from that fool Charlie....
http://semiaccurate.com/2013/12/02/nvidia-exits-another-major-market-segment/
Analysis: Nvidia to exit another major market segment
You got to love his passion for anything Nvidia
I looked for a review of the 780 Ti on SA but sadly nothing, so I looked for older reviews for 780/Titan andagain nothing. Maybe Charlie tried to get a job at Nvidia and got turned down for being a cry baby. The man is on a campaign to single handedly take down Nvidia (he does seem to have a few helpers about the forums) but going from the forbes facts, Nvidia so far seem to be holding out
Nvidia designs and develops Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), which are high performance processors that generate realistic and interactive graphics on PCs. Despite the company’s high dependence on the PC market, it has managed to grow its GPU business in the last few quarters. While PC shipments declined by 3.7% in 2012 (fiscal year 2013 for Nvidia), Nvidia’s GPU segment expanded by 2% and it reported a 7% rise in its total revenue. Year-to date the PC market is down 11%, but Nvidia’s GPU business is up 4%, compared to the same period last year.
During the UBS Global Technology Conference this month, Nvidia declared that the primary reason that it has managed to outpace the PC market is that it does not, and has not ever, addressed the bottom 70% of the market. Its main focus has been on those vertical segments within a broader computing market where visual computing matters the most, including gaming, PC gaming, professional visualization and design, high-performance computing, and big data analytics. [1] Nvidia?s growing presence in the specialty PC and Compute markets (gaming PCs, workstation PCs, and high performance computing) is offsetting the declining trend in the mainstream PC market.
With rising revenue contribution from the non-PC business segment and its dominance in the GPU market, Nvidia has strong long term growth potential, in our view. Additionally, the company continues to have a solid balance sheet with a strong cash position and no debt.
Our price estimate of $16.42 for Nvidia is almost in line with the current market price.
See our complete analysis for Nvidia
PC Gaming Is Driving GPU Growth In Desktops & Notebooks
Nvidia sells its PC graphics to two key segments: 1) PC Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), who use Nvidia GPUs to manufacture the final product; and, 2) gaming enthusiasts, who use GPUs in high-end and custom PCs to generate realistic and interactive graphics. While lower-end PC shipments to OEMs have slowed, the robust PC gaming market has contributed to higher GPU shipments, starting in fiscal 2013 and continuing in fiscal 2014 as well.
Nvidia’s GPU gaming revenues are up 6% year to date compared to the same period last year, while mobile GPU gaming has more than doubled in the last two years. Even as overall notebook shipments have declined, Nvidia’s gaming notebook revenue more than doubled in the last two years. The company claims that notebook gaming is the fastest growing PC SKU that it currently serves. [1]
In Q3 2014, Nvidia launched a number of products specifically targeted at the gaming market. It recently unveiled its fastest gaming GPU ever (the GeForce GTX 780 Ti) and launched NVIDIA G-SYNC technology, which enables near-perfect synchronization between the GPU and the display, solving the decade- old problem of on-screen tearing, stuttering and lag. It also introduced GeForce ShadowPlay, a software platform that lets gamers record, stream and share their best gaming moments.
PC gaming represents almost 40% of the worldwide gaming market, which is higher than consoles, phones, tablets or any other individual gaming segment, and we believe it will continue to drive Nvidia’s GPU shipments. [2]
Leadership In Professional Graphics – Tesla & Quadro
Driven by the release of new Kepler-based GPUs, Quadro enterprise revenues and Tesla revenues are up by 12 % and 43% year to date, respectively. Kepler is Nvidia’s most efficient GPU architecture to date and is now available top to bottom for workstations and servers. The company claims that the introduction of Kepler has translated into higher market share and margins for the company. Accounting for 80% of the market, Nvidia remains the dominant player in professional GPUs.
The growth in High Performance Computing is driving demand For Nvidia’s Tesla GPUs as Co-Processors or Accelerators in high performance systems. In the last year, the percentage of high performance computers with accelerators has almost doubled and Nvidia accounts for 85% of the increase. [1] The company has been investing in advanced computing and its own CUDA technologies for years and its business at the high end is at last gaining momentum
Nvidia recently was showcased at a Supercomputing industry event with its Tesla GPUs in a Twitter Big Data analytics deployment. More notably, earlier this month, the company announced that IBM will include Tesla accelerators in its its next generation supercomputers and will be developing accelerated versions of IBM enterprise software applications with Nvidia CUDA GPUs. Note that IBM dominates the commercial end of the Supercomuting market. So this is a major win. Finally, Nvidia has launched the Tesla K40, which is the world’s fastest accelerator for Supercomputing and Big Data analytics. In fact, it is included in the world’s current number one supercomputer and will likely be included in future high-end systems now in development.
Love them or hate them, they know their business.
And in other news from that fool Charlie....
http://semiaccurate.com/2013/12/02/nvidia-exits-another-major-market-segment/
Analysis: Nvidia to exit another major market segment
Nvidia has triumphantly exited markets such as chipsets or taken a step back from other markets such as Denver/x86. They seem to be setting the stage for yet another rearward advance. Which major market are the tea leaves prognosticating about this time around? Stick with us for a bit of back story before we get into that detail.
Before we get in to the meat of this, let’s do something to save us a lot of time and letters, going through some history. SemiAccurate and this author in particular has a long history of outing Nvidia stories long before anyone believes they could be real. With semiconductor design cycles running between 2-4 years, longer for some projects, decisions made today won’t be seen in public for years. Those with sources and ears to the ground can give an accurate picture of the goings on at a semiconductor company years ahead of time with very high accuracy.
Project cancellations are the easiest of the major changes to spot. Teams that should be working on the successor to project X being moved to a different line and no replacements named are an obvious sign. Roadmaps that end are another but there are many others, and how the company messages things are another good leading indicator. Nvidia in particular has a way of laying the groundwork for an impending rearward advance that is playing out as we speak.
Moving back to the history, let’s go over some of the highlights for SemiAcurate predictions on Nvidia. The author made a call that Nvidia had no chance of hitting the Q4/2012 or Q1/2013 dates it promised analysts at CES for Project Denver. Although it was directly stated to multiple analysts in one-on-one ‘private’ meetings, the company at the time knew there was no chance of it happening but directly said otherwise.
That said, SemiAccurate was the only one to say it and then described the core down to the pipeline level. For the record Denver is still unreleased for the reasons we said and a 2014 release is borderline at this point in time. The Tegra roadmap SemiAccurate published years ago was almost dead-on, later renamings aside. Compare and contrast those to the official messaging if you are really bored this holiday season. Suffice it to say that we know the Tegra roadmap quite well.
Then there are the GPUs, another topic SemiAccurate does not live up to its name on. From determining the root cause of the bump failures to calling the company out for shipping known defective parts to Apple, we are usually far ahead of the curve. Killing off parts preemtively, tapeouts, low yields, faking samples, roadmap slips, cancellations, personnel changes, and even big wins are all known to us. There are some mistakes too but we will stand by our track record of bringing you Nvidia news months or years ahead of the rest. If you are still bored after going over the Tegra roadmap history, feel free to do the same for GPUs.
Why are we going over this history? Because the latest one is a pretty big bang that won’t be seen for quite a while. If you go over the available data carefully, there is only one conclusion you can draw. Just like their exit from the chipset business, don’t expect them to admit it until it is both long dead and they can pin it on some other tangential external event to deflect blame.
You got to love his passion for anything Nvidia

I looked for a review of the 780 Ti on SA but sadly nothing, so I looked for older reviews for 780/Titan andagain nothing. Maybe Charlie tried to get a job at Nvidia and got turned down for being a cry baby. The man is on a campaign to single handedly take down Nvidia (he does seem to have a few helpers about the forums) but going from the forbes facts, Nvidia so far seem to be holding out
