That's a shame. So is David Icke still queen of the lizard people then?
Do you think the Queen will ever write her memoirs?
- Thread starter NinetyOne
- Start date
That's a shame. So is David Icke still queen of the lizard people then?
I think her views on the event during her life will be recorded, however how the information gets to the public is debatable. take the diaries of most of the past monarchs, you cant exactly walk into your local waterstones and pick up a copy of the diary of for example henry VIII. his accounts of events are most likely available to scholars who then interpret them for the general public. i think something similar will happen with the queen's memoirs
This.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 3,030
would be hilarious if she did - and it turned out she was a massive racist/druggie/****
I heard that in her free time she's actually MC Lizzie.
One is simply not amused, do you know who I am?
I'm QE2 ******* but you can call me ma'am.
You lookin' at me funny? Right, I'm comin' after you.
Gonna cut you in the shower you dirty little Jew!
Watch me smile and wave - yo that's all for show,
When i clock off after work me n Phil - we do some blow!
PEACE OUT LOYAL SUBJECTS!!!!!
*drops mic*
I find this kind of response odd (though I realise you're a frog and so hate our royal family
) coming from you of all people in GD.Whether or not you like the person or what she represents, she must have led an incredibly interesting life, met some of history's most important, famous, notorious and interesting people, and lived through some of the most defining periods of time of our history. How could that not be worth reading (assuming decent penmanship!)?
Last edited:
.
But you cared enough to post that?
I can't understand the hate towards the Queen at all. Is it the cool thing to do now?
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,834
I wonder if she will write about how her husband plotted to kill Diana
I think you're confusing hate with ambivalence.
Flight and the ability to talk to small animals.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,812
- Location
- Falling...
I find this kind of response odd (though I realise you're a frog and so hate our royal family
Whether or not you like the person or what she represents, she must have led an incredibly interesting life, met some of history's most important, famous, notorious and interesting people, and lived through some of the most defining periods of time of our history. How could that not be worth reading (assuming decent penmanship!)?
Well my point was, that let history speak for itself and let it be catalogued - a biography of a head of state who wasn't voted in to me just seems a little contrived and pointless or perhaps a little self serving. None of the previous monarchs did it, and historians catalogued their exploits independently.
I find what she has been through in terms of the world changing around her interesting, but as the power of the monarchy is more and more eroded they (to me) seem to do very little other than represent the country - it's not a bad thing, and they do it well - but because I don't follow the royal family and care little about them, to me it just does not interest me. I'm probably wrong, but I don't feel the queen has shaped or form where the UK is now.
It is current - not historic. Give it a hundred years and I'm sure the history of ER2 will be much more interesting to those reading about it.
Why is that relevant?
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
If they were truly ambivalent, one wonders why they feel the need to make a post? I'm ambivalent about a lot of threads in the forum, and you'll struggle to find a single post on mine in them.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 20 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 3,814
- Location
- Cambridge/Chicago
You dont need to hold any paper "powers" to be highly influential... She might be powerless but there is a chance that her opinion or decision is regarded higher than of Cameron for example... Simply because she has been around for so long and clearly has some serious connections...
Being ambivalent about something doesn't preclude one's right to state their ambivalence on a subject.
