Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,884
- Location
- Surrey
Would 3/4 x 780ti's not be better, or are they vram limited?
4K Surround with 3GB of VRAM is like taking a my little princess bicycle to a destruction derby.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Would 3/4 x 780ti's not be better, or are they vram limited?
4K Surround with 3GB of VRAM is like taking a my little princess bicycle to a destruction derby.
Haha Ok. Are 290x's not a viable solution (is 4gb still limiting as well?!!) or do we need custom cards under water for some monster overclocks?
Actually, you'd almost need 4GB with everything maxed in Crysis 3 on a single 4K screen.
Isn't Mantle supposed to stack the VRAM? So 2x290's = 8GB - 3x290's = 12GB or have I misread this?
Isn't Mantle supposed to stack the VRAM? So 2x290's = 8GB - 3x290's = 12GB or have I misread this?
I don't know that much about mantle but to do what you describe above would change the way CF works.
It allows developers to implement their own multi-GPU configs, but AFAIK it's unlikely we'll see stacked VRAM anytime soon. Johan mentioned using 1 card for rendering and others for compute tasks, AI, etc. As opposed to just AFR which we have now. If I've understood it right we could see >2 GPUs become much more prevalent as you could maybe have 2 in AFR and another for purely logic, not drawing anything but accelerating portions of code that are well-suited for a highly-parallel system like a GPU. We have already seen something akin to this with hybrid PhysX, where an ATI crossfire setup could run alongside an Nvidia card.