• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New gfx. 290>780?

Not too sure about that, considering most GTX780's (except for reference) standard boost clock is above the core clock of the stock clock of the 290.

I have no idea as to the clocking potential of the 290 out the box - however my 780 boosts to 1188 out the box goes upto 1300 within the normal voltage range allowed and is a distinctly average clocker compared to 780s as a whole and thats not a terrible result compared to GPUs in general. (Reference boost clock being 900MHz).
 
Last edited:
I have no idea as to the clocking potential of the 290 out the box - however my 780 boosts to 1188 out the box goes upto 1300 within the normal voltage range allowed and is a distinctly average clocker compared to 780s as a whole and thats not a terrible result compared to GPUs in general. (Reference boost clock being 900MHz).


I would say that's a above average clocker, my lads Evga 780 SC clocked to 1189 on stock bios/volts.
 
Yeah could be - I spend a lot of time looking at extreme cooled/max voltage results which might be skewing my perspective a bit.
 
Got a Sapphire R9 290 myself, had nothing but problems with it. It is getting picked up tomorrow so I can get my money back. I will be getting the GeForce 780 SC ACX, not risking another 290.
 
I can recommend the 780 - it clocks pretty well, it's fairly quiet, it's reliable and it's just generally a great graphics card. It handles most games I throw at it on near max settings at 2560x1440 - except for some of the more intensive titles like Crysis 3.

From the problems I've seen people having with the 290, I would avoid it for the moment.
 
No one thinking of the Ti780?

JB

Had a hard time justifying to myself the extra cost, especially was kind of happy with my decision when I took out the (at stock speed) 780ti I'd borrowed to try and troubleshoot an issue I was having with my new build, stuck the 780 GHZ in and in BF4 there was only ~1fps less on the part of the testing range map I'd been using to compare framerates.
 
Well I'm sending back my faulty Gigabyte 780 GHz tomorrow by DSR. I know it's faulty, but can't be bothered waiting for them to test it etc

I was 100% certain that I was going to get a 290 Tri X Sapphire, but after hearing these reports on dodgy 290's I think I will go with another 780, maybe the EVGA 780 SC ACX.
 
Well I'm sending back my faulty Gigabyte 780 GHz tomorrow by DSR. I know it's faulty, but can't be bothered waiting for them to test it etc

I was 100% certain that I was going to get a 290 Tri X Sapphire, but after hearing these reports on dodgy 290's I think I will go with another 780, maybe the EVGA 780 SC ACX.

Good shout on the ACX :)
 
Recently was in a similar situation debating what to replace my 7990 with. Wanted to go down the route of 290/X with custom coolers but the delays and issues with them made me go for a 780 classified. No regrets at all.
 
Recently was in a similar situation debating what to replace my 7990 with. Wanted to go down the route of 290/X with custom coolers but the delays and issues with them made me go for a 780 classified. No regrets at all.
Interesting choice alex, iirc LtMatt switched from 7990 to x2 290's a few days ago. The 290 series ref cards do seem to be a bit hot running/power hungry, (bit like the nv 400 series). Ones with better coolers will help with the former, not the latter. But then non ref cards in sli/xfire arent ideal either as i can testify to. But with the current demand for high end amd cards for mining, you can make a few quid by selling them on. Its not just australia thats hit a mining boom.:D
 
Back
Top Bottom