UFO disrupts travel at Bremen airport

the sheet is nothing to do with projectors. it is a cloth material they refracts light and show the scenery behind it. it is a US company developing it that made the digital camo the US troops use. i came across it researching something for Planetside 2.

plus the tech you know now is 60 years behind what we actually have. my Dad worked for BAE for over 30 years and trust me. there is **** out there people have no clue about. the black bird was designed and developed way before anyone saw it.
 
that is such painful ******** it almost hurts my head.

we've just about been able to make macro materials to reroute microwaves around a very small cylindrical object, in one direction only.


also the "sheet" you're talking about is just reflective, what you are forgetting is behind the camera there is a **** of projector shining a picture of the background o nit, makes a cool picture/video but shining a 200watt projector bulb on your sniper makes him suspiciously visible.

No, it's a real invisible plane - I know it's true because I didn't see it...
 
lol i agree, some toys just look strange.

Yes, I know what you mean. For example I was looking to purchase a toy rabbit to keep Flopsy company on the mantelpiece. However, upon searching the Internet for "rabbit toy" I found some most perplexing results, many of which bore no resemblance to fluffy bunnies.
 
Yes, I know what you mean. For example I was looking to purchase a toy rabbit to keep Flopsy company on the mantelpiece. However, upon searching the Internet for "rabbit toy" I found some most perplexing results, many of which bore no resemblance to fluffy bunnies.

lol, well these days no matter what you search for you get some very surprising and sometimes disturbing results :) :eek:
 
the sheet is nothing to do with projectors. it is a cloth material they refracts light and show the scenery behind it. it is a US company developing it that made the digital camo the US troops use. i came across it researching something for Planetside 2.

plus the tech you know now is 60 years behind what we actually have. my Dad worked for BAE for over 30 years and trust me. there is **** out there people have no clue about. the black bird was designed and developed way before anyone saw it.

if it showed whats behind it it would be a clear piece of plastic.....

i work with lots of guys who worked at BAE if your dad told you there was an invisible plane he was having you on, and if it were true you should be very careful saying that as you're opening your dad up to criminal prosecution and a jail sentence as he'll have had to sign the official secrets act. (man was the day we had to sign that dull, so much lecturing)

and the blackbird was fairly well known it was just put out as an interceptor not a recon plane. it wasnt exactly a stealth plane the econ it entered the air it was on every civilian and military radar.
 
Last edited:
Hyper intelligent species capable of travelling the vast distance from whatever Galaxy they come from, hangs around above an airport to **** off a couple of commuter jets. Sounds likely.

Douglas Adams wrote an explanation for this in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - adolescents, quite possibly drunk, going around in their spaceships winding up primitives on backwater planets for laughs.

Silly though it is, it is sort of vaguely plausible. Advanced technology doesn't necessarily mean advanced maturity.

But I think a remote control flying thing from Earth is a far more plausible explanation for this event. Easy to miss from a plane, easier to detect from the ground.
 
if it showed whats behind it it would be a clear piece of plastic.....

i work with lots of guys who worked at BAE if your dad told you there was an invisible plane he was having you on, and if it were true you should be very careful saying that as you're opening your dad up to criminal prosecution and a jail sentence as he'll have had to sign the official secrets act. (man was the day we had to sign that dull, so much lecturing)

and the blackbird was fairly well known it was just put out as an interceptor not a recon plane. it wasnt exactly a stealth plane the econ it entered the air it was on every civilian and military radar.

lol go look it up. the same people who created adaptive camo for the US army are making it. it is not a clear piece plastic.

plus my dad was not having me on. it flew at night with 2 Tornado escorts. i used to listen to it go on test runs with a scanner.

i know where i was kept years ago. may have moved now as was years ago. trust me, you do not know everything that is going on.

read some of this. they make camo for the US armed forces

http://www.hyperstealth.com/Quantum-Stealth/index.html
 
don't they use professional cameras mounted on tripods ? and an F1 car is predictable and nowhere near the same distance away from the camera lol

It doesn't matter what type of camera it is, the same principles apply to all optical devices. The farther away the object is the lower it's angular velocity relative to the viewer and the easier it is to keep in the frame at any given focal length, at such distances there's no difficulty focusing either because the focusing distance can simply be set to infinity without any need to change focus, and assuming your using a standard parfocal SLR lens, changing zoom will not change the focusing distance either.
 
Last edited:
lol go look it up. the same people who created adaptive camo for the US army are making it. it is not a clear piece plastic.

plus my dad was not having me on. it flew at night with 2 Tornado escorts. i used to listen to it go on test runs with a scanner.

i know where i was kept years ago. may have moved now as was years ago. trust me, you do not know everything that is going on.

read some of this. they make camo for the US armed forces

http://www.hyperstealth.com/Quantum-Stealth/index.html

Why would military command guys want to see the stealth cloak in action if they already have the technology for the invisible plane?
 
No, it's a real invisible plane - I know it's true because I didn't see it...

I can confirm this is true - I also haven't seen it, therefore it must be invisible!

plus my dad was not having me on. it flew at night with 2 Tornado escorts. i used to listen to it go on test runs with a scanner.

Right... so a top secret military jet that no-one knows about yet, and they broadcast their radio comms during test runs on an unencrypted channel so it's easily accessible to the public?

I thought schools went back yesterday? :confused:
 
It doesn't matter what type of camera it is, the same principles apply to all optical devices. The farther away the object is the lower it's angular velocity relative to the viewer and the easier it is to keep in the frame at any given focal length, at such distances there's no difficulty focusing either because the focusing distance can simply be set to infinity without any need to change focus, and assuming your using a standard parfocal SLR lens, changing zoom will not change the focusing distance either.

So have you ever tried to do this? I've tried to photograph a UFO before with a hi 8 film camera and it came up with nothing discernable.
 
Last edited:
So have you ever tried to do this? I've tried to photograph a UFO before with a hi 8 film camera and it came up with nothing discernable.

8mm video is very low resolution so it doesn't surprise me you didn't get anything discernible. I use an SLR myself but I have better things to do than film ufo's :p, I shoot animals myself which works along the same principles.
 
Back
Top Bottom