*sigh*
My comments were reflecting the conversation going on in this thread, and were not sweeping,. I now appreciate (again from the conversation in this thread) how big a deal this is in the football world.
Some of your statements were sweeping, as were some of mine, but yours are based on;
I care not about football and never watch it or follow any news about it. I couldn't even tell you who the England captain was.
So, you admit to having a very limited knowledge of football, yet will happily make the statement;
Fair enough, didn't really realise football was so backward (not that it surprises me).
Anyway

. We all make sweeping statements, I do, because I'm not writing academically on here or trying to argue my point particularly strongly, those who understand football, understand why this is newsworthy

those who don't, will not understand the impact.
My comments and crticism still stand firm that this shouldn't be news, and that I am still incredulous that such neanderthal behaviours exist within the football work. Which as you say is regarded as working class - but then is there any surprise? If statements like this news article are anything to go by, the it isn't surprising people have those (however unfair) preconceptions on the sport.
Why should it not be news? Clearly news agencies feel this is newsworthy and it is within football news. I would argue that two things;
- We don't live in a perfect world / society
- Raising awareness can be a good thing
I absolutely 100% agree that someone being gay is irrelevant, however we do not live in a world where this is true. Gay people are persecuted all over the world still and many live in fear. Hitzlsperger clearly did in terms of what the implications were for him from the fans.
Also; how else are you to defeat this line of thinking without raising awareness to problems and working them out? Football can be a fantastic vessel for change and can help solve problems. Look at the racist culture that existed in this country and the work that went in to addressing that, you can not argue that something like that would have been as successful without awareness.
I totally get why this shouldn't be a thing, but people forget that we live in an imperfect world, perhaps the football micro (despite it's numbers in the millions & millions) society that surrounds football. Football has it's own culture and that culture very much has gay footballers as a taboo. It's all about change and if you aren't willing to discuss, raise awareness and educate how else will that happen? Fans will not wake up one day and be like '**** this is all wrong, we have to stop', it takes time.
Ergo, my opinions and comments are entirely valid, as they are based on the article and the comments that others are making towards the subject.
Opinions aren't invalid (well sometimes) but people are making comments and forming opinions without an understanding of football and how it works in terms of socially and it's history and culture frustrate me. As Bob Dylan said, “Don't criticize what you can't understand.”
Any perfectly rational human being being blown away by this news is quite frankly silly. Sure, within the football world, this is big, but outside of that, this really isn't news, as it shouldn't ever be needed to be dramatised to such an extent.
Why? I don't think many people are 'blown away' but many are praising him for coming out with this statement and many are highlighting that as far as football as come, there is still a long way to go.
The newspeople deem what is worthy of news coverage and how things are covered, as I said, awareness and educating people about problems can only be a good thing.
Do you wander around shouting "I'm straight" or "I can do 1000 sit ups" or whatever, or heck another example a banker saying "I pay my taxes!" - so what? It really isn't important is it, and it is what is to be expected and isn't anything but "normal".
I don't wander around shouting things like that, because I'm not likely to suffer dogs abuse or be persecuted. Your trying to apply rational thinking to tribal-istic (yes that's now a word) football fans, without taking in to consideration the history or society that exists within football fans.
Irrespective of ignorance of the intricacies of football, there is enough media spotlight on it to pick up enough knowledge, and as mentioned I have my contacts who deal with it regularly, sure it may be coloured slightly, but it still gives me enough to form a perfectly fair ability to criticise what I read/see - like anything, there's more than 1 side to a story, but each have their own credibility. Sure, I tend to skip articles about football specifically, though I am interested in business related news that Abramovich is involved in for example.
You keep saying you avoid or skip football stories and don't know much about it, try talking to people that do know about it, from its history and social impact, or read books that deal with this.
In my rugby days lots of people came out - did that mean we didn't share showers? no! yeah we took the **** a little, but all of us take the **** out of each other. You just go, "oh fair enough" and carry on. The more you put the lid on it the bigger the issue becomes. I abhor this media sensationalism over trivial things - that's mainly my frustration with this - not the underlying "read between the line" implications of what it means to football or football fans or the industry as a whole.
I've played both football and rugby (at levels I'd struggle to call amateur) and I've seen both sides of the coins, I've seen people being homophobic and I've seen people totally not see a problem with being gay. I've also read loads of books about football history and I've been to hundreds of games. I don't really understand that part of your comment though, sorry.
As for the media, meh, as I said, it's up to them to sell news to people, they do this through sensationalism, so they decide what to be outraged/in favour of, it's what they do.
Raising awareness of a problem can be a good thing though, and can help it. There is no 'read between the lines' either, people that are involved in that sort of football society understand the bigger implications of this in that world, those that aren't struggle to understand it.
We both totally agree that someone's sexuality should not be a problem but that isn't how the world or footballing worlds work.