I would agree with that.
As do I. Read my reply.
I would agree with that.
Quite so and on those grounds it ought to be quite easy to design a study to determine, once and for fall, whether it worked and what it worked for? Placebo being a blanket term expression for the most part.The point I was trying to make earlier is that while the reasoning behind traditional acupuncture is well a load of rubbish to be quite frank but people use that to write it off entirely, certain aspects of it more by accident than design do actually have some effect - some placebo some seemingly real (generally thought due to triggering or stimulating certain body systems/chemical release). There are certain studies of some of the techniques used to relieve headaches that seem to show them actually working but they get lost amongst all the stuff used to debunk the wider topic and/or dismissed because people fear they will give validity to the wider topic.
There is a pressure point near the thumb that can reduce headaches (without even needing needles) - its been blind tested doing it on the spot and nearby on different individuals so it does apparently work.
As do I. Read my reply.
Where is it Gillywibble said he was expecting it to work?
Given the body runs on electrical impulses and metal needles can effect electrical currents I'm not sure how this can be called power of suggestion, I've had 3 sessions so far and its certainly working for me...
This demonstrates the fundamental misunderstanding of basic biology which leads people to believe this nonsense.
I stood on a nail once, went right through my boot and into my foot.
Y'know I completely forgot about my backache? Amazing.
Personally I went in to in with an open mind but leaning on the sceptical side, as for a misunderstanding of basic biology, rather than the flippant comment hows about an actual explanation, if someone puts those slender tone things on electrical impulses trigger muscle's, yet your saying needles in certain places wont have have an effect, and someone that thinks they will has a fundamental misunderstanding of basic biology?!
In any case, they said that a specific line of argument showed a fundamental misunderstanding of basic biology, namely that the human body is an electrical circuit.
Electricity always follows the path of least resistance, which would be through the cross-section of the needle. One wrong premise, one missing premise and an unconnected conclusion - that does indeed show a fundamental misunderstanding (of biology, electricity and logic).
If you think acupuncture works for magical reasons, well, OK, that's part of your faith and since it's not rational or based on evidence then there's no counter-argument.
If you put forward an argument to claim that acupuncture works and there's a natural, rational reason why, then your argument is fair game.
I suppose it's possible that acupuncture might relieve pain by causing some nerve damage, maybe. Presumably temporary.
But how could acupuncture help? How can it physically remove a knot in the muscle?
Who said anything about argument, this was, as fair as I'm concerned a discussion, the word argument would suggest aggression and lack of reason fueled by personal motive and emotion.
All I did was ask if people had tried it, and if they had what they thought, so far I've had a few people say they tried it and it worked for them and then more people coming in, having not tried it and rubbished it as an idea having had no actual contact with it themselves..
Just because you dont know how or why something works doesnt mean that it doesnt work.
There are people on here that have rubbished accupuncture as an idea because they havent tried it and dont understand it, yet they quite happily drive around in a car when they dont understand how it works....
ASMR, in my experience. Given all most "knots" are is tension.