Hope you're a troll, and not really this stupid.
It takes me considerably longer to stop when I'm driving a transit van than my own car but I still manage not to crash the transit every time I drive it because again a good driver adapts his driving according to the vehicle and grip available
I guess my point is there are endless car/tyre combinations available all of which will offer a different level of grip so to blame a tyre because a driver doesn't recognize the limits is dumb
So in effect better tyres = less issues with grip + more predictability + less chance of finding a ditch.
I read on here all the time and there's been many many threads about tyres and many people label tyres with less grip as "ditch finders"
Well I would like to set the record straight. When you jump in a car you drive it gently and build up confidence in the grip available by building up corner speed etc until you feel the point at which the Tyres start to break grip and you remember this and drive the car within that limit.
You would have to be an idiot to jump in a new car or your old car with new Tyres on it and drive it into corners hard without re-learning the level of grip available!
Hence my statement Tyres aren't ditch finders BAD DRIVERS ARE DITCH FINDERS.
lol!
A troll?
He speaks the truth, vans and trucks are totally different to cars and require a different approach.
Of course, but the point is, it doesn't matter in an emergency stop. Because rather than adapting to the road ahead and adjusting your speed/braking time accordingly, you are just trying to pull up as quickly as possible.
Hence, the argument that poor tyres are fine as long as you drive accordingly is not a justification for fitting cheap, crappy tyres, because it's not always possible.
All tyres even the cheapest have a level of grip.
When this level of grip is exceeded they become dangerous - same with the best tyres.
A family car driven slowly so as not to exceed the grip of it's budget tyres is not unsafe IMO.
The problem occurs when you fit cheap tyres to your Porsche and wonder why you are travelling backwards up the Snake Pass in the wet.
But what about people who DO understand limits and know what a good and bad tyre can bring to the driving dynamic of the vehicle? If the entire car industry and the motorsport world spend 100s of millions in R&D on tyre technology there must be a reason behind it.
Tyres make a big difference to the handling of a car.
Common sense and being sensible prevents silly things from occurring - i.e. driving with your, and the vehicles limits.
Obviously driving beyond the limits regardless of tyre make is going to lead to bad things.
However, all this is just plain common sense isn't it?
Modern cars perform well.
It was a big deal if your car would do 100MPH when I started driving.
If you intend to drive at motorway speeds I would suggest good tyres.
Drive 3 miles to the supermarket once a week in standing traffic? You could probably do that on remoulds.
A van shouldn't be travelling as fast as a car (lol)
I know that doesn't happen!
But a good driver will leave a gap so that he is able to stop safely.
If something suddenly appears in front of you, that can happen to the best cars, best tyres and best drivers.
A Porsche will stop far better than any car I have ever owned but that doesn't make it safer for one moment.
His argument is predicated on the fact that the driver always controls his/her circumstance when in reality it's not that simple. We can all drive defensively, we can all leave gaps and follow appropriate speed. We can all drive within these constraints but sometimes we can come across a circumstance, let's use diesel around a blind bend as our example, when no matter how well you drive you can get caught out. At which point the effectiveness of your kit has a greater impact than your ability behind the wheel.