• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA Announces Q4 FY 2014 Results: Above Expectations!

Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,284
Location
Essex innit!
It wouldn’t be February if we didn’t hear the Q4 FY14 earnings from NVIDIA! NVIDIA does have a slightly odd way of expressing their quarters, but in the end it is all semantics. They are not in fact living in the future, but I bet their product managers wish they could peer into the actual Q4 2014. No, the whole FY14 thing relates back to when they made their IPO and how they started reporting. To us mere mortals, Q4 FY14 actually represents Q4 2013. Clear as mud? Lord love the Securities and Exchange Commission and their rules.

View Full Size
The past quarter was a pretty good one for NVIDIA. They came away with $1.144 billion in gross revenue and had a GAAP net income of $147 million. This beat the Street’s estimate by a pretty large margin. As a response, trading of NVIDIA’s stock has gone up in after hours. This has certainly been a trying year for NVIDIA and the PC market in general, but they seem to have come out on top.

NVIDIA beat estimates primarily on the strength of the PC graphics division. Many were focusing on the apparent decline of the PC market and assumed that NVIDIA would be dragged down by lower shipments. On the contrary, it seems as though the gaming market and add-in sales on the PC helped to solidify NVIDIA’s quarter. We can look at a number of factors that likely contributed to this uptick for NVIDIA.

Click here to read the rest of NVIDIA's Q4 FY2014 results!

Add-in sales were brisk primarily due to the release of quite a few next generation titles which leverage DX11 functionality. Users who have machines several years old still have the CPU horsepower to handle these new titles, but have found a need to upgrade their graphics cards. The variety and selection of titles for the PC matches or exceeds that of the Xbox or Playstation consoles. Steam sales and a thriving independent game development scene have also added impetus for PC gaming. We must also consider that only just recently have the next generation consoles hit the market, and the launch titles for those products are not necessarily in the realm of “a killer app”.

View Full Size
JHH will be seeing this view for a while due to NVIDIA postponing the construction of their new office buildings.

All of the other products in NVIDIA’s portfolio showed a decline year over year. Quadro stayed about even but had a weaker quarter as compared to last. Tesla also saw a decline quarter over quarter due to large scale build-out schedules. Tegra saw a drop due to the lack of overall pickup of Tegra 4 throughout this year. Even though Tegra 3 was not a huge seller, Tegra 4 was worse. Tegra 4 is seeing some uptake in the automotive market due to some strategic partnerships and what looks to be some very aggressive software development help from NVIDIA with their customers. There is a lot of internal optimism for the Tegra K1 and the Denver based, 64 bit Tegra a bit further down the line. The addition of the Kepler graphics technology to their ARM based offerings is a very strong move by NVIDIA that could pay off with increased marketshare for their products. The recently released Tegra 4i could create a positive uptake for Tegra overall due to the inclusion of the LTE/programmable modem.

Net income is down as compared to last year, and this is attributed to a higher operating income. My guess is that NVIDIA continues to pour as much money as possible into SOC development. NVIDIA certainly did not burst upon the SOC scene as they were hoping to. They are a niche player when compared to the Qualcomms and Samsungs of the world. They do have very valuable graphics IP which looks to play a more important part this coming year. NVIDIA also has no real choice but to pursue the SOC market. While the PC Graphics division is still the prime mover for the company, SOCs will be the future. I can foresee that in about 10 years the value proposition of a standalone graphics card for most use cases will be nearly nonexistent. To ensure that NVIDIA stays relevant, they have to address the SOC market very aggressively. As we have seen with AMD and Intel and their inclusion of competent graphics capabilities with their CPUs, NVIDIA must go the route of including a competent CPU with their graphics.

View Full Size
With the inclusion of the Icera programmable modem, the Tegra 4i could be a breakout product for NVIDIA. Could be...

Revenue for this next quarter is expected to be in the $1.05 billion range. Seasonality again rears its ugly head, but NVIDIA looks to have at least one more major release for the desktop this year. Overall the company seems healthy and they keep finances under control. It is interesting to see that NVIDIA gained marketshare this past quarter with all of the rage about coin mining and AMD graphics cards. I wonder if the engineers at NVIDIA are upset that they didn’t provide better GPGPU capabilities with Kepler to take advantage of the potential market for cryptocurrency mining?

NVIDIA just keeps chugging along, but this year will certainly be important in terms of the SOC strategy. Tegra 4i with the integrated modem could be a relatively successful product, but we also have their Denver based products to look forward to. The Denver version of K1 was shown up and running at CES and we can assume that they are continuing development on that 64 bit product. No timeline has been given for its introduction, but the best guess would be a late Q3 release. Until the point where they can offer a much more compelling product in the SOC market, NVIDIA will rely on their strong graphics portfolio to keep them heading into 2014 (FY2015).

I have pulled out this quote from this read, which doesn't surprise me at all.

NVIDIA beat estimates primarily on the strength of the PC graphics division. Many were focusing on the apparent decline of the PC market and assumed that NVIDIA would be dragged down by lower shipments. On the contrary, it seems as though the gaming market and add-in sales on the PC helped to solidify NVIDIA’s quarter. We can look at a number of factors that likely contributed to this uptick for NVIDIA.

I have read a couple of people here say that "nVidia will be going under because AMD have the consoles and lost IBM's contract" or similar and seems they were completely wrong :D
 
You'll bring out all the "they're ripping us off" boys and girls now despite it being no different than any other successful business.

Good news also for those who have Nvidia stock as the stock has gone up over 10% in 3 or 4 days with possibly more to come if the new mobile graphics chip is as good as Nvidia say and it sells - that could bode very well too ,something like 4x the power of a chip currently used in the iPhone if memory serves me correctly and about the same level of performance as that found in last gen consoles.
 
Last edited:
I have read a couple of people here say that "nVidia will be going under because AMD have the consoles and lost IBM's contract" or similar and seems they were completely wrong :D

Like who exactly?

We constantly see a few people say every other quarter "see everyone says they are going under, but they haven't therefore, haha on all those who said they would".

yet, I've not seen anyone say they would.

Aside from that, their Tegra sales are a disaster, which is where the company is spending huge amounts in R&D. Their profits are down, and with two particular earners set to stop in the not to distant future, that being, PS3 income and their quarterly payments from Intel over the lawsuit. Their current profits are looking very weak based on the fact that without the PS3/Intel income they'd likely be pushing a loss(and would have been close to a loss in most of the past couple years in most quarters).
 
I would imagine Nvidia sales are picking up because of GPU mining sucking up supply of AMD GPUs.

Most have only started latching onto mining in the past month, don't think that alone is enough to boost nvidia sales. Also if someone wants to mine they'll either buy used or wait for stock instead of buying a nvidia card which can't do it?
 
You'll bring out all the "they're ripping us off" boys and girls now despite it being no different than any other successful business.

Good news also for those who have Nvidia stock as the stock has gone up over 10% in 3 or 4 days with possibly more to come if the new mobile graphics chip is as good as Nvidia say and it sells - that could bode very well too ,something like 4x the power of a chip currently used in the iPhone if memory serves me correctly and about the same level of performance as that found in last gen consoles.

They've used that line for Tegra 3 AND Tegra 2, 3 officially, and it was rubbish and 2 they posted a lot of video's of gaming on it and Jenson kept harping on about how it looked like console level graphics... it didn't.

The media materials on Tegra 4, well, ask Anandtech or read their info on it. Nvidia TOLD them this was what would appear in phones in their Tegra 4 preview, and it had performance that blew the competition away. Many months later Anandtech were told this chip/setup was running at almost 10W, so it was thrashing a comparative Apple chip in graphics while running 4 times the power level for the overall chip.

You can take any Apple or Qualcomm chip and clock it 50% higher, unlock the TDP and stick a huge heatsink on it and you'd get 3-4 times the performance. It's not a case of 300Mhz vs 600Mhz on a gpu chip is twice as fast, in a 2W tdp in a phone that 300Mhz is maximum and rarely achieved. 600Mhz with a huge heatsink and 10W tdp could be 5-10 times faster vs a half speed chip that also throttles.

All the tegra K1 info is "we have X performance,.............. and over here we can run it at 2.5W. They did NOT say we have X performance AT 2.5W". They are doing exactly what they did with Tegra 1/2/3/4 in terms of marketing, the same marketing that caused everyone to stop using their products(guys building the devices, not those buying them).

Anandtech refused to do a Tegra K1 preview because Nvidia refused to tell them how much power it would be using, Anandtech got stung for trusting Nvidia, and refused to do the preview without the knowledge upfront, that Nvidia refused to tell them and thus didn't do the preview should tell you everything you need to know. As should the gargantuan heatsink on their Tegra K1 demo producing such performance. It's a heatsink that could barely fit in a full size laptop let alone a phone.

Tegra K1 performance in real tablets and phones will be interesting, tegra K1 performance at 4x the tdp you'll see in any real world devices is meaningless.
 
Last edited:
Most have only started latching onto mining in the past month, don't think that alone is enough to boost nvidia sales. Also if someone wants to mine they'll either buy used or wait for stock instead of buying a nvidia card which can't do it?
Gamers who can't get hold of AMD cards will buy Nvidia cards. The mining rush started a good few months ago.
 
I have read a couple of people here say that "nVidia will be going under because AMD have the consoles and lost IBM's contract" or similar and seems they were completely wrong :D

Your Trolling.

Always looking to start an argument.
 
Gamers who can't get hold of AMD cards will buy Nvidia cards. The mining rush started a good few months ago.

The price hikes didn't though, only in the past few weeks and most of it in North America with 1 retailer. I just don't think mining is the reason nvidia have done well.
 
The price hikes didn't though, only in the past few weeks and most of it in North America with 1 retailer. I just don't think mining is the reason nvidia have done well.

Yeah, it's something to do with having a 780 available at below £400. Got nothing to do with mining. If the 290x was £600, not many AMD buyers would have gotten it, if many months later the price crashed to below £400, the sales would increase drastically. The 780gtx was a horribly priced card, AMD launched competitively priced high end cards, Nvidia dropped 780gtx prices through the floor, sales for both companies increased.
 
The price hikes didn't though, only in the past few weeks and most of it in North America with 1 retailer. I just don't think mining is the reason nvidia have done well.
It's not really to do with price hikes, it's product availability. If it's not available price doesn't really matter so when someone looks to buy a GPU for gaming they choose either AMD or Nvidia, when someone buys a GPU for mining they choose AMD. Nvidia are picking up the slack on the gaming side and have been for months.
 
It's not really to do with price hikes, it's product availability. If it's not available price doesn't really matter so when someone looks to buy a GPU for gaming they choose either AMD or Nvidia, when someone buys a GPU for mining they choose AMD. Nvidia are picking up the slack on the gaming side and have been for months.

I think this is probably true, retailers, especially in the US are cashing in on Mining, some have the high end AMD GPU's 60% above RRP and they are still struggling to keep up with demand.

AMD are selling higher end GPU's as fast as they can make them, but none of the benefits are going to AMD, and its coin diggers, not Gamers who buy them.

Its a serious problem.
 
It's not really to do with price hikes, it's product availability. If it's not available price doesn't really matter so when someone looks to buy a GPU for gaming they choose either AMD or Nvidia, when someone buys a GPU for mining they choose AMD. Nvidia are picking up the slack on the gaming side and have been for months.

Hmmm I've had a look around and most cards are still in stock? How many people are really going to switch to nvidia as well when their price/performance isn't as good as AMD's, only really the 780's.
 
Hmmm I've had a look around and most cards are still in stock? How many people are really going to switch to nvidia as well when their price/performance isn't as good as AMD's.

I'm thinking about a 4GB GTX 770, if the 280X prices get much higher....

Even with AMD having Mantle, which i think is very significant. i'm not paying <£300> for a £200+ GPU, AMD's are starting to get that way because of retailers profiteering.
 
I'm thinking about a 4GB GTX 770, if the 280X prices get much higher....

Even with AMD having Mantle, which i think is very significant. i'm not paying £300+ for a £200+ GPU, AMD's are starting to get that way because of retailers profiteering.

:confused:

You just agreed with Jokester when he said it's nothing to do with pricing then you go on to say it is to do with the prices?

A 4gb 770 is not worth its price either.

£320 will get you a used EVGA 780 with transferable warranty.
 
Last edited:
4 models available, 2 being the cheaper ones with over 10 in stock. Doesn't seem that bad to me, if you move over to the 290's there's loads of stock.

He doesn't work for OCUK humbug.
 
Back
Top Bottom