Is that handheld with a video link?
You've clearly DL and installed it!
Is that handheld with a video link?
One major thing - to generate revenue. Either by selling people's information or selling information to the NSA/US Government. There may be small ads integrated at some point in the future. Or some other underhand way as yet unknown to us or that will never been known over the radar.
One thing's for certain, all people's conversations will now be recorded [if they haven't already been] and passed over to the authorities.
They aren't buying the 'App'. That's just part of it, they're buying the connectivity of people. Who's talking to whom and how often, how does that trend against things happening in the world, possibly where a user is when they're chatting, what time of day it gets used most etc. All analytical stuff that can go to advertisers.
None of that requires a change to the service provided.
Voice messaging, that was called a phone call when I was a lad!
Behave. Phones didn't exist when you were a lad!
Don't get me wrong, I've used it, once, twice maybe. I just don't see the real appeal for it when similar is built into every phone nowadays anyway.
With facebook in control, if you really believe that won't change then you're a fool. It's like a political party claiming they won't raise taxes in the run up to an election.
There's no way that Zuckerberg isn't going to find a way to add more monetising to Whatapp. He needs to justify to the shareholders spending that amount and show that by spending that he's going to make more out of it.
69p at current market is $1.14 so IF it stays as is and IF every user pays 69p a year to use Whatapp. it would take around 37 years just to recoup the purchase price.
Well yes i know, he has to have a plan to use it somehow... but you keep saying the App will not change in any way yet offer up no ideas on just why he would buy it if he has no plan to alter it in any way.
Seriously, give it another good go - every single person (embarrassingly, including me) has said the exact same thing as you, before that realisation of how good it is.
It tells you who else has it in your phonebook (across Blackberry, Android, iOS, Windows phones, Symbian), you can send pictures instantly, videos, sounds, locations, it tells you when things have been delivered, it tells you when people were last "online", you can set statuses, you can mute things, you can have group chats, you can send all of the above to an entire group, you can use it with no signal, it's all but free, you can use it abroad for nothing but data.
Sure there are other built in apps to do this kind of stuff, but if you:-
- Want to send a picture to someone, you have to use the archaic MMS (if your settings are correct - and you'll probably be billed 40p for it), email (a lot of people don't have email on their phone/you don't have their email address/things go into spam and never get seen again etc), or a manufacturers built in IP messaging system, which means you can only communicate with people who have the same type of phone as you.
- Want to send a short video clip....email only/manufacturers proprietry
- Want to send a message - SMS/email/manufacturers proprietry
- Want to organise something via a group message - Email/manufacturers proprietry
Or
You could just use Whatsapp which does all of the above and puts them in the same place so you can actually follow what's happening. Whatsapp does nothing new - but just puts it in a nice package and makes it much much easier to use than before. In fairness, i'm suprised Apple/Google/Microsoft didn't buy it out when it was in it's infancy. I could see whatsapp was becoming big about 3 years ago.
And no, i don't work for Whatsapp's marketing department![]()
Unless I'm missing something, the only way thing that Whatsapp lacks is the ability to access it from a desktop pc/laptop/internet browser. So if you don't have your phone you can still upload messages via another means. Unimportant issue though.
And it's like a political party. lol. Politics is a bankrupt venture. This is business.![]()
What good is all that real-time data if advertisers can't immediately capitalise by feeding a directed ad at that person?