DRL + Appliance White Audi + iPod/iPhone/iPad + Superdry Jacket = life complete
Don't you know you noob
Don't you know you noob
DRL + Appliance White Audi + iPod/iPhone/iPad + Superdry Jacket = life complete
Don't you know you noob
Well if you want to be silly about it, why don't we make all cars bright neon colours all over?
If it saves a life...?
for me sunrise/setting is when you start thinking about lights off/on.
[TW]Fox;25911490 said:Bling ones look tacky, non-bling ones are like a massive 'I bought the base model with no Xenons' advert, so its kinda hard to get a middle ground that works
I think they should have been introduced years ago, why do motorbikes ride with lights on, simple fact, so they can be seen.
My GF hates the guts out of my A5 and the DRLs, she seems to think they are "showing off" "oh look at me" cars LoL.
That's exactly what they are though.
Within 3 years most new cars will deliver with full LED headlights. Deal with it.
[TW]Fox;25911490 said:Bling ones look tacky, non-bling ones are like a massive 'I bought the base model with no Xenons' advert, so its kinda hard to get a middle ground that works
They let you know the car is 'on' and moving or may possibly move, that alone is enough to warrant having mandatory lights, hence why it is now a legal requirement for new
Precisely. Twilight is the time between dawn (first light) and sunrise (when the sun comes over the horizon), or sunset and dusk. Therefore, the sun is below the horizon at these times and irrelevant to the point I was making, which was about the sun being in your eyes....which means it has to be over the horizon.
You're still missing the point. No one is saying that DRLs are required to spot a car in daylight, only that it can only make things easier. Illuminating an object will make it easier for the human eye to detect and for your brain to process it's existence that little bit quicker, and it also makes spotting an object in your peripheral vision (which is far more sensitive to movement) easier.
You may think it makes no difference to you, but I can pretty much guarantee that you would spot a car with DRLs more quickly than one without, whether subconsciously or not, and that speed of detection might make all the difference in a driving situation. That is where their value lies.
Surely it would be far safer to start thinking about lights on/off whenever the conditions dictate?
[TW]Fox;25911490 said:Bling ones look tacky, non-bling ones are like a massive 'I bought the base model with no Xenons' advert, so its kinda hard to get a middle ground that works
I just don't see the point in certain conditions
Incredibly useful in California, cars driving out of the low sun are virtually invisible without DRLs