***The Official Battlefield 4 Thread***

16tick servers is the biggest problem imo

if they could get that up to 100 tick and up the bandwidth of all their servers then they should be able to cope with 64 man easy enough.

i don't think there is a way to fix it and they keep their servers set up how they are currently.

make sure you play on europe severs too, they are located in ireland so we in the UK should be getting better pings than the rest of europe.
 
Psycho Sonny said:
16tick servers is the biggest problem imo

if they could get that up to 100 tick and up the bandwidth of all their servers then they should be able to cope with 64 man easy enough.

i don't think there is a way to fix it and they keep their servers set up how they are currently.

make sure you play on europe severs too, they are located in ireland so we in the UK should be getting better pings than the rest of europe.
Click to expand...

Yeah I only play EU, but it seems that doesn't help in the slightest. I lag every game without fail. It's probably too expensive for them to fix so we won't see much of any improvement.

I only got an Xb1 to play BF4 as all my mates had done the same. May as well sell the piece of junk again and stick with PC.
 
Ingenious TROLL said:
Yeah I only play EU, but it seems that doesn't help in the slightest. I lag every game without fail. It's probably too expensive for them to fix so we won't see much of any improvement.

I only got an Xb1 to play BF4 as all my mates had done the same. May as well sell the piece of junk again and stick with PC.
Click to expand...

who is in charge of the servers is it EA or Dice or a combination of both?

if EA have anything to do with them then it will never be fixed. they have never re-invested enough money into servers. i've had their web app crash on me over 1000 times now for one of their games. they have always been laggy and a joke for how much money they make.

i mean if games like war thunder can run fine with no lagg or problems (free to play game) then i don't see why BF4 cannot.
 
cu3ed said:
I joined added whatever, didnt we have something like this before?
Click to expand...

We had platoons in BF3, but they never made it across to BF4.

Today is the first day you could create a BF4 platoon. Anybody any good with the emblem editor and fancy knocking us up an actual overclockers one ?
 
Psycho Sonny said:
who is in charge of the servers is it EA or Dice or a combination of both?

if EA have anything to do with them then it will never be fixed. they have never re-invested enough money into servers. i've had their web app crash on me over 1000 times now for one of their games. they have always been laggy and a joke for how much money they make.

i mean if games like war thunder can run fine with no lagg or problems (free to play game) then i don't see why BF4 cannot.
Click to expand...

I've no idea whether it's Dice or EA, but I'll see if I can find anything on the net about it. The PC version always ran fine without lag for me. How can they get away with not improving the games stability?!

Fr0dders said:
I've created an Overclockers UK Battlelog Platoon

Feel free to join here

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/platoons/view/1496991233136988121/

lets see how many members we can get !
Click to expand...

Well I'll sign up later when I'm not at work and in a better mood :p Rank 110 here and put a lot of hours in so should get us some good XP :)
 
Ingenious TROLL said:
I literally get lag on every game, and I am getting fed up of it.

Are they actually ever likely to fix the lag on Xb1? Is it the servers, or netcode? What's the issue. The constant warping/lag/fps drops are really putting me off playing the game.
Click to expand...

I get lag as well. The annoying thing is that a server can be perfectly fine for quite a while and then you start getting lag and rubber-banding. When I've been playing with people from here we all notice it at the same time :confused:

spookywillow said:
It sure is, Can't wait till either they fix it or 32 man conquest servers are up.
Click to expand...

I really wish they'd give is 32 man conquest. I'd rather play that than 64 players.

Psycho Sonny said:
who is in charge of the servers is it EA or Dice or a combination of both?
Click to expand...

It's EA's servers. They are very well known for having utterly crap servers. People who are getting TitanFall are extremely lucky that the servers on that are Microsoft's and not EA's.
 
Can't believe how smooth the fps is now on Rush on PS3, the sea on Paracel Storm is massively improved also! Finally a playable game...
 
48 is probably the right number imo 32 would be too small for such large maps.

or they could just upgrade all the servers? that ideally would be the best scenario.

i won't be buying another FPS until things improve, that's why I haven't touched the last 2 COD's it also is a joke. (please no elitism COD used to be the number 1 FPS in the world back in the day)
 
Ingenious TROLL said:
May just have to play some domination or rush for the time being then, but I really love conquest :(

Even lowering the player count to 48 for conquest would probably help!
Click to expand...

Conquest is my favourite mode. Which is why I find it annoying they have 32 player games in the server browser but no servers for them :mad:

*edit*
Or why not 40 player conquest? 4 squads on each team. Makes sense to me!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom