Can someone give a document a quick check

Associate
Joined
13 Aug 2004
Posts
830
Hi all, I need some help with a preview I wrote for a site. I was wondering if someone would be good enough to give the document that is in the spoiler bit a check over for grammar, etc. I ask as I have been writing voluntary for a site and have been doing fine, but now a new editor have come in decided to rip apart this document.

I was looking for a 2nd opinion on it as I am no writer by any means and have learnt as I have gone along. I know I got a few mistakes in it, but I didn't think it was as bad as it was made out. Any help from people who know more about writing than me, would be appreciated. Thanks


Project Spark is a world-creation game, or app, as that seems to be the “term” on tablets, and Microsoft Store. It allows the gamer to become a designer, and what you can create is only limited by your imagination. Unfortunately, the beta is very limited as to what you can actually do, but it is still fun to play around with, and create your own level which you can actually play after you have made it. At this moment in time, the beta is only available for Windows 8.1 users, so this probably had a major Impact on the actual number of people who signed up to the beta, given that Windows 8 is still not everyone’s cup of tea.

When you begin Project Spark you are presented with an introduction that explains the goals of the game – to create and play in a sandbox world. The intro actually looks quite nice with stunning, vibrant colours showing off the universe in which you play. Then you come to a nice, simply laid out main menu, where you can choose what you want to do; play community-created content, computer generated content, or start to create your own masterpiece. Also included is a good tutorial so that you can learn the basics needed to go and create the world of your dreams, then test it out and upload it for other members of the community to play and edit.

Veterans of simulation games that allow you to build your own worlds and cities will feel at home, as the fundamentals are the pretty much the same. You begin with a small map and all the tools that you need to start building your level. You got a paint tool that allows you to add various textures to the land such as grass, trees, snows and rivers, for starters. The editor also makes it easy to create mountains, and this is accomplished by simply dragging the cursor to where you want it, and then use the sliders to adjust the scale and intensity. At the bottom of the screen you will notice a progress bar, this allows you to fast forward or rewind time. This is handy, as you can make changes to your world and if you don’t like it, then you drag the bar left and undo the change, or if you think “I like that,” then you can drag to the right to redo them.



Next you then get to choose what characters you want living in your newly created world. These range from humanoid creatures like Orcs, to animals like squirrels. Once placed in the world, you can then alter their behaviour by using simple “If this…do this” mechanics so that you can get to grips with programming with learning a whole language. So essentially, with just a few clicks you could create an Arctic Squirrel, which has the ability to throw fireballs around the world, which it actually quite cool. Of course there are more detailed options available, but for people starting out and looking for some fun without a steep learning curve, then this is the creator for them.

Then after your level is completed you are ready to explore it and take a walk around. This is done by using the typical third-person controls of WSAD and mouse, but keep in mind that that the default character only has a double jump, roll, and punch available. Enemies can be added and programmed using the same mechanics as the character you create. Of course if you are not great at designing a new world, fear not as the community have created quite a few good games. One that sticks out is the Flappy Bird clone, which is very creative. The visuals are nice, but unfortunately quite generic. While it should not be a deal breaker, the simplistic graphics may not be to everyone taste, but the specs needed are quite low. This beta was run using a Dual-Core I5 laptop with an HD 4000 graphic chip, and the game runs smoothly.

Overall, Project Spark is a very enjoyable experience, and consideration that it is in beta stage, very polished. Sure you are restricted with the amount of stuff available to create a world, but it still gives enough that a creative mind can create a playable world. It will be interesting to see what happens when the game is out of beta, as then we should see some very interesting levels created by the community.
 
Quick glance. You don't put commas before "and" e.g.

Unfortunately, the beta is very limited as to what you can actually do, but it is still fun to play around with, and create your own level which you can actually play after you have made it.

You seem to put a comma before "and" quite often.

In fact, you overuse commas a lot where they shouldn't be. Example:

So essentially, with just a few clicks you could create an Arctic Squirrel, which has the ability to throw fireballs around the world, which it actually quite cool.

Why the comma here?

Should be
So essentially, with just a few clicks, you could create an Arctic Squirrel which has the ability to throw fireballs around the world. This is actually quite cool.

See changes in red (punctuation changes)

Going to work in a min so dont have a chance to write more
 
Last edited:
Could do although I would just remove the comma and use the word "which" i.e. "which is actually quite cool". However, IMHO, it reads better having the "This is quite cool" as its own separate sentence.
 
Had a quick few mins before leaving. Deletions are marked Red and substitutions are in Green


Project Spark is a world-creation game, or app, as that seems to be the “term” on tablets, and Microsoft Store. It allows the gamer to become a designer, and what you can create is only limited by your imagination. Unfortunately, the beta is very limited as to what you can actually do, but it is still fun to play around with, and create your own level which you can actually play after you have made it. At this moment in time, the beta is only available for Windows 8.1 users and so this has probably had a major Impact on the actual number of people who signed up to it, given that Windows 8 is still not everyone’s cup of tea.

When you begin Project Spark you are presented with an introduction that explains the goals of the game – to create and play in a sandbox world. The intro actually looks quite nice with stunning, vibrant colours showing off the universe in which you play. Then you come to a nice, simply laid out main menu, where you can choose what you want to do; play community-created content, computer generated content, or start to create your own masterpiece. Also included is a good tutorial so that you can learn the basics needed to go and create the world of your dreams, then test it out and upload it for other members of the community to play and edit.

Veterans of simulation games that allow you to build your own worlds and cities will feel at home, as the fundamentals are the pretty much the same. You begin with a small map and all the tools that you need to start building your level. You have a paint tool that allows you to add various textures to the land such as grass, trees, snows and rivers, for starters. The editor also makes it easy to create mountains, and this is accomplished by simply dragging the cursor to where you want it, and then use the sliders to adjust the scale and intensity. At the bottom of the screen you will notice a progress bar which allows you to fast forward or rewind time. This is handy, as you can make changes to your world and,if you don’t like it, then you drag the bar left and undo the change, or if you think “I like that,” then you can drag to the right to redo them.



Next you then get to choose what characters you want living in your newly created world. These range from humanoid creatures like Orcs, to animals like squirrels. Once placed in the world, you can then alter their behaviour by using simple “If this…do this” mechanics so that you can get to grips with programming with learning a whole language. So essentially, with just a few clicks, you could create an Arctic Squirrel, which has the ability to throw fireballs around the world. This is actually quite cool. Of course there are more detailed options available, but for people starting out and looking for some fun without a steep learning curve, then this is the creator for them.

Then after your level is completed you are ready to explore it and take a walk around. This is done by using the typical third-person controls of WSAD and mouse, but keep in mind that that the default character only has a double jump, roll, and punch available. Enemies can be added and programmed using the same mechanics as the character you create. Of course if you are not great at designing a new world, fear not as the community have created quite a few good games. One that sticks out is the Flappy Bird clone, which is very creative. The visuals are nice, but unfortunately quite generic. While it should not be a deal breaker, the simplistic graphics may not be to everyone taste, but the specs needed are quite low. This beta was run using a Dual-Core I5 laptop with an HD 4000 graphic chip, and the game runs smoothly.

Overall, Project Spark is a very enjoyable experience, and consideration that it is in beta stage, very polished. Sure you are restricted with the amount of stuff available to create a world, but it still gives enough that a creative mind can create a playable world. It will be interesting to see what happens when the game is out of beta, as then we should see some very interesting levels created by the community.
 
I have no time to read the OP, but you can sometimes use commas before the word and.

Agreed but not when listing things. e.g. on the very first line before MS Store


As stated I have no time to go anal on it, just some mild corrections. Of course this is IMHO as everyone has slight deviations on how they read things so not saying mine is 100% correct. No doubt come back tonight and see mine ripped to shreds as well :p
 
Grammatically, there are several mistakes.

  • As others have said, you are comma-happy. You seem to have an issue with run-on sentences, where you try and say too much in one sentence, which should really be split into more than one, which is annoying to read. <-- Like that. Sometimes you also have clauses hanging at the end of sentences, for example "and Microsoft Store" at the end of the first sentence - what is that supposed to be attached to? If it's supposed to be "tablets and Microsoft Store" then the comma is wrong.
    (A general rule for you: if a sentence contains more than two commas, and you're not writing a list, rewrite it.)
  • You've inexplicably quoted the word "term" in the first sentence. Why? Do you not understand what it means? (I also don't understand why you're trying to explain what an "app" is, but that might be your audience?)
  • You've capitalised "impact" in the first paragraph.
  • Third paragraph has a few errors - "you got a paint tool" obviously is wrong. "Snows" should be "snow". You then mix up your tenses when describing the process of creating mountains - using "dragging" in one clause then "use" in the next - be consistent.
  • Fourth paragraph, more commas and clauses that just run on: "... you could create an Arctic Squirrel, which has the ability to throw fireballs around the world, which it actually quite cool." Richie's amendment above is better. (Also "is" not "it".)
  • Final paragraph - "consideration that is is in beta stage" should have course be "considering".
In addition to these grammatical issues, your editor may have reviewed the document stylistically - that is, reviewing vocabulary, tone, choice of phrase, etc. This is quite subjective to the editor, the publication and the audience, so I can only offer some general thoughts on that...

  • Clichés: "Windows 8 is still not everyone's cup of tea".
  • Your tone is not very consistent - you switch from observational and relatively formal (paragraph 2, first 2 sentences), to informative and informal (the process of creating mountains). Phrases like "sticks out" and "sure you are..." are very informal. Without knowing what audience you're writing for, I can't really say if that kind of switching (or the informal tone at all) is something that the editor would pick up.
  • You sometimes repeat words. In the second paragraph "the intro actually looks quite nice" ... "then you come to a nice, simply laid-out menu." In the final sentence, "it will be interesting to see what happens ... we should see some very interesting levels created by the community."
  • Some very clumsy construction: "... get to grips with programming with learning a whole language."

I don't suppose you can post the amendments your editor suggested, or tell us some more information about the kind of audience you're writing for?
 
Thanks all for the help and advice much appreciated. I write for a PC games site which covers news and game reviews and previews. So it is pretty much aim at gamers. My news writing and articles are fine. I am not sure I can post the amendments as it is on Google drive and edited. I can post the link to see if it works.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/14OWpVFVGY9ZTQfDNzWjrksT8lZPDt9ffdE6GoENEkPA/edit

I ended up using comma a lot as when I first started writing for them I was told that my sentences were to many words. So I used full stops and then told it was bad for flow and read as bullet points. So I am still trying to find a way, as I have been told different things by about 6 different editors who does the edits for the site.

Thanks again though.
 
"cool"

You really can't think of a better word to describe it than that? :D

I ended up using comma a lot as when I first started writing for them I was told that my sentences were to many words.

Sentence structure. It's not about breaking it up with punctuation it's about getting the wording right. Why write 6 sentences/lines of text when only 1 will do?
 
Back
Top Bottom