Poll: SR-71 or Eurofighter

Would you have an SR-71 or a Eurofighter?

  • I am a manly man and would have the SR-71

    Votes: 513 70.7%
  • I am a homosexual and would prefer the Eurofighter, kthx

    Votes: 213 29.3%

  • Total voters
    726
Interesting, thanks.

I wonder how many kills the F-22's have on Typhoons by comparison. I don't suppose we'll ever know really. I've read a lot about it in the past but it's mostly bitching about which aircraft is better and why, not actual results from engagements. That info isn't available to the public after all so all we can do is speculate.

Nice to know the Typhoon is up to the task though. If it can take down an F-22 then I think it's fair to assume it could also take down the Russian and Chinese 5th gens.
 
Last edited:
Considering the size of my (parents) driveway and front garden it would have to be a Harrier for me since its the only plane that comes to mind that takes off vertically.
 
I've touched an SR71 (well, an A12 actually) and it was probably the highlight of my 39 years on this planet. Well.....maybe the birth of my son would come close. Maybe :)
 
Nice to know the Typhoon is up to the task though. If it can take down an F-22 then I think it's fair to assume it could also take down the Russian and Chinese 5th gens.

There have been several training engagements, but the problem with these is that the ROE are generally not published and the scenario often disadvantages one aircraft.

F22 kills by Typhoon have all been close range (and often within IRST range - F22 is not particularly IR stealthy). The whole point of the F22 is that it engages beyond visual range and is stealthy enough that you can't detect it until after it has killed you.

Very short (and therefore bordering on inaccurate) summary is that Typhoon is a dogfighter, F22 isn't. Kills have been in dogfights.

The problem the F22 has at the moment is that it's AA missiles don't have any longer range than Meteor so it can't take full advantage of the BVR capability. There's no point in being able to safely identify a target if you have to get within their detection range to actually kill it. That said, BVR is only useful under relaxed ROE.

You also have to consider cost - F22 is roughly twice the cost so the real comparison is one F22 vs two Typhoons. DERA did a study looking at weighted kill ratios and came to the relatively objective conclusion that F22 was twice as effective as Tyhoon.

Final comment is that F22 is only particularly stealthy head on. Side and rear aspects are between 10 dB and 30 dB worse.

It's all a bit of a moot point unless we go to war with the US - F-22 is not exportable and all attempts to develop and export version have crashed and burned.
 
There isnt a need of a modern one in this day and age thats why there isnt one. Infact you could say that spy satellites are the modern version?

Oh I know there isn't need for one, I'd just love to see them make a high altitude plane go as fast as they possibly can using modern materials and technology :D
 
So i've being trying to get my head around something I saw 2 weeks ago in southern england(east sussex to be exact).

What my brother saw and then pointed out to me was very high in the sky a contrail that had lots of donut shapes about 4 fingers apart stretching as far as the eye can see (imagine your arm stretched out with your fingers together, roughly i'll hasten to add, cant remember exactly though there were an aweful lot, wish I had taken a picture now!). They dissipated pretty quickly within a few minutes to just resemble a usual looking contrail, only it appeared to be higher than what you usually see.

So , given that it was multiple donut shapes (a bit like the donut on a rope analogy) would something that was traveling faster than the speed of sound create one sonic boom, or multiple booms over and over again and would they be visible to the eye if you couldn't hear them?

I was reading on the Aurora wikipedia page and noticed people have heard strange sonic booms in the late 90's over California coupled with sightings of the donut on a rope contrail, now run with me a little, is there a feasible chance that what ever this was is flying high enough that no sound would be audible, lets say because whatever plane it might be, has become more advanced , hence the ability to fly so much higher out of audible range?

Am I going mad? Was it a missile perhaps? Or even just a very fast fighter plan creating multiple sonic booms all the way across the sky?

:confused:
 
So i've being trying to get my head around something I saw 2 weeks ago in southern england(east sussex to be exact).

Am I going mad? Was it a missile perhaps? Or even just a very fast fighter plan creating multiple sonic booms all the way across the sky?

:confused:


http://www.dreamlandresort.com/black_projects/donuts.htm

I cant answer the are you going mad question but the above link should answer your DOAR question...
 
Back
Top Bottom