If you are concerned about your ability to home school, have you looked into montessori and stiener schools?
I believe that would be commonly referred to as going 'full retard'.
If you are concerned about your ability to home school, have you looked into montessori and stiener schools?
You seem to rope all state schools in as being like this, which is not true.
But they are in the majority, sadly.
But this hasn't been my experience across the board in all subjects. Just a few narrow minded teachers.
I believe that would be commonly referred to as going 'full retard'.
This is exactly what i mean.
"get a half decent job"
"less about actually learning anything of worth for modern times."
"Home schooling is passable providing the child sits exams according to Edexcel, OCR etc..."
See, for me, if my child ends up with Empathy, Creative, Imagination and a passion for learning, i don't care what they do. Because i know they will do what they want to do with the correct tools to do it.
I think its the fact that they teach you nothing of real term worth was his point.Why?
Because they teach you the Fire pixie?
Yet its ok to teach children that a small women with wings steal your teeth from under your pillow and leave you money?
Or that a bunny goes around and leaves you chocolate eggs?
Seriously?
I agree you shouldn't tar with the same brush, but if the shoe fits?
As i said previously, my wife's work takes her to schools all across the UK, on average the class size is 1 teacher and 1 helper to 30+ pupils, the teachers are generally PGCE cross educated from a 2:2 they got at Uni and they needed a job.
The helpers are mostly parents of children in that class, who don't have the courage or support at home to go alternative, but want to see their children growing up.
The children are sat down at tables, in their uniforms, for up to an hour at a time (Who's children can sit still for an hour being lectured too??) about 1 subject, they are allowed their breaks (Which again match the working day, 8 hour working shift pattern by law is allowed 2x 15min breaks and a half hour break) of which is heavily supervised to stop bullying and "dangerous play", then they return and the process goes around again.
I'm not saying all teachers are bad, but they are very few and far between.
So you want them to become an 'artist'?
I don't understand why you think they cant gain empathy etc from schools? Especially since Ofsted exist and their reports are public knowledge, allowing you to avoid the dire schools.
I think its the fact that they teach you nothing of real term worth was his point.
But being honest, I can't afford to homeschool or private school, And have had no issues with my ability to supplement the downfalls of state schools, and think many hide behind the downfalls of schools in the shame of how little time they spend actively participating in their childs education
I have less issue with the fire pixie, more with the belief that the 'white' human is a more advanced stage of ethic evolution - non-white people are inferior in many ways, according to Rudi. Also, things like this:
“But the people that didn’t develop their id, that was too exposed to the influence of the sun, they were like plants: They produced far too much carbon under their skin – and became black. That is why the negroes are black.”
But most of the UK believe that Muslims are terrorists, so why is one more acceptable then the other?
Home schooling is as expensive as you make it. Trips to museums and events are sometimes free, equipment is trivial as once you've got it, you've got it. You can subscribe to online teaching, which is amazing when you have world renowned professors teaching your child basic math
Its not that bad.
I'm meaning from the point of I would not be working, therefore couldn't afford it.
I am the sole income.
No, just the idiots, but luckily they are a minority albeit a vocal one.
Most of them don't teach that.
But most of the UK believe that Muslims are terrorists, so why is one more acceptable then the other?
OK, you are clearly wedded to your views, but for what it is worth: neither is acceptable - your argument is a straw man, and biased from your own perceptions. Also, your arguments are unsupportable from evidence, but we don't need to get in to that.
I would be interested, however, in the evidence that children in Montessori schools 'actually perform better in every way then normal state schooled children'.
Your example is flawed:Again stop thinking horizontal, not everything has to lead to a job.
What if my Son becomes a Doctor, from his own choice. Then through his passion of self learning, learns another language and opens up a hospital for free to help others?
Is that a wrong path to take?
Do you know what Empathy is?
Why?
Because they teach you the Fire pixie?
Yet its ok to teach children that a small women with wings steal your teeth from under your pillow and leave you money?
Or that a bunny goes around and leaves you chocolate eggs?
Seriously?
To become a doctor you need a masters, to get onto a medicine course at Univeristy you need grades, lots of them - there is no getting around this issue.