Aborted Babies incinerated to heat Hospital!!

What does the law say regarding the death of a woman carrying a baby (by something like murder)? Are they charged with one murder, or do they include the unborn child(ren)?

I don't know criminal law but as far as the children's act, 1989 you can't apply for a care order on an unborn child
 
Besides, they aren't babies when they've barely been conceived a few weeks, more a merging of cells.


You have no idea
google "what do aborted babies look like"

they are fully formed babies.

I can't post a picture because, well, it's a dead human really.
Also Catholics would regard these as people at conception.
 
It's not a life until it can survive outside of the womb, which is past the legal abortion limit :rolleyes:

Well, to me it is a life. Its the start of life.

Anyway, going by some of the comments in this thread it just reminds me how sad and sick this world can be.

Death of human life should be treated carefully and with feeling. Its a pity the death had to occur in the first place but still, one should respect that life even if the parent/s etc didnt.
 
Ok, some agree with abortion. That is their prerogative. Whatever one thinks on that, one should not just throw the remains into an incinerator without a lot of thought etc. The headline is alarming. Clinical waste to me is not the incinerating of what is the start of human life! Some dignity should be shown at the very least. A little life destroyed and then tossed without any care into a mix of other hospital byproducts etc. Disgusting!

It's not a life when terminated, surely you see the distinction?

This is a non headline and poor form shown from the Telegraph which is obviously designed to illicit a response and get some traffic.

What the hell did you think happened to them....thrown up to heaven or something?
 
Ok, some agree with abortion. That is their prerogative. Whatever one thinks on that, one should not just throw the remains into an incinerator without a lot of thought etc. The headline is alarming. Clinical waste to me is not the incinerating of what is the start of human life!

You have to define life, which, as I understand it, is when an organism can breathe and function entirely independently. Which a foetus cannot. It is on its way to being alive in the same way as a grape is on its way to being a glass of merlot.
 
Non-story.

Clinical waste used to heat hospital shocker.

As someone's already pointed out, the problem (if you want to find one) is in defining the "dead babies" as clinical waste, not with what the hospital does with said waste.
 
"Foetal remains"

i.e the chopped up bits left after an abortion..

Who is is going to want to have a "ceremony" for something you didn't want in the first place.

Total non story if you ask me.
 
What does the law say regarding the death of a woman carrying a baby (by something like murder)? Are they charged with one murder, or do they include the unborn child(ren)?
Child destruction under the 1929 Act is the usual charge.
 
Don't see any problems with it. The hospitals have to do something with the unwanted fetuses and they are unwanted hence the abortions in the 1st place.
What I do have a problem with in these news reports is them been called baby's. There not baby's, there not burning baby's there unwanted medical fetuses and are been dealt with appropriately.
 
Last edited:
You have no idea
google "what do aborted babies look like"

they are fully formed babies.

I can't post a picture because, well, it's a dead human really.
Also Catholics would regard these as people at conception.

*a few weeks* not 20-30. Plus I do have some idea, having spent time in a mortuary.

And the spritual side of things is in the eye of the beholder of course.

Oh plus for babies that have been 'lost' through no will of the mother, there is the option to of course have a sevice and burial etc.
 
I bet if you could see it all form outside the womb you would call it human as soon as it takes on human form and features. And i hate to say it but after fertilization it is still a life as it is living and its only a matter of time until it lives that life and grows old its destiny is made the minute after fertilization. Its the person who decided to terminate it that decides it does not have a life. And technically it wont once the decision is made. Its a human made concept of is it alive yet or is it not.



You need to be a hardcore athiest to put up a good its not a life arguement and im not even a Catholic.
 
Clinical waste is clinical waste and needs to be incinerated...

When does a blob of dividing cells become human? (rhetorical question... can't be bothered getting into the nitty gritty - just wanted to say its a sensationalist headline)
 
Back
Top Bottom