Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 13,768
- Location
- La France
John Carmack working at Facebook is like Yoda piloting the Death Star.![]()
You've got my vote in the Quote Of The Year nominations...
John Carmack working at Facebook is like Yoda piloting the Death Star.![]()
I bet all the people crying about this development have FB accounts....
"Oh no, facebook is becoming less relevant to society - best buy something new and hip"
This does really **** me off though, I was looking forward to some VR gaming, looks like Facebook are going to completely ruin that for me.
It's going to be a stream of poor games, expensive DLC which you need to complete said game, data mining and advertisement. It's going to set back VR by years if not decades.
What's your point? You don't think people with AIDS think that's a bit **** too?
Rubbish, you know just as well as I do Facebook are going to spray their stink all over this to make it marketable to morons and no good devs are gonna go near it.What utter nonsense, the company does not make games. It's just Facebook money. Things will go on as they were yesterday.
Rubbish, you know just as well as I do Facebook are going to spray their stink all over this to make it marketable to morons and no good devs are gonna go near it.
Facebook hating aside, is there any valid reason why this is bad?
NoFacebook hating aside, is there any valid reason why this is bad?
No. Other than silly people thinking Facebook will take control (no sign or reason for them to do that) and try to market something that is game orientated (there is several other markets especially in design industry) and will like cost ~£300 to Facebook users, because a webpage really utilizes VR.
Just paranoid Facebook hating at it's best.
Thought as much. I fail to see what impact this will have on those just looking forward to playing PC games on it. Reminds me of the Disney buying Star Wars hysteria.
On a side note, your fundraiser amount was annoying me so I sorted it out.
But how are they to make a profit from it if it's only marketed at computer-literate people (specifically gamers)? From what we've heard so far, they plan to invest a big chunk of money into creating bespoke components for it -- rather than using ones designed for the mobile market -- and sell it for significantly less than they would have been able to had they carried on independently. Given the dev kit is in the region of £300, they need to be aiming at the £100-200 price range and they'll need to sell a *lot* to be profitable.Naïve, come on what can they realistically do to it?
Render thumbs up in 3d and somehow attach OR to tablets and phones, which is by far the biggest way fb is accessed. and sell a ~£300 debice to computer illiterate people. When they won't even spend that much on a tablet of phone.
Come on it is so far outside of fb core business it has nothing to do with fb, just profit.
http://www.engadget.com/2014/03/25/facebook-oculus-vr-2-billion/Update: We're on the call now, and Mark Zuckerberg is already pointing out Facebook's acquisition of Instagram as an example of how the company is getting experience buying properties and allowing them to continue to operate independently. Zuckerberg called out virtual reality as one of the computing platforms of the future -- following desktops and mobile -- and yes, talked about building Facebook's advertising into it. Specifically, he talked about the potential of a virtual communication network, buying virtual goods, and down the line, advertising.