Over generalisation there.
Did you read the bit where I said "as a group" in the middle of the bit you quoted?
It's not a generalisation, it's a fact. Individuals may fall outside the average, but "as a group" they under-perform.
Over generalisation there.
You've got kids - surely you find being an active parent as exhausting as I do?What gets me is those parents that don't take responsibility for teaching their kids life skills as well as academic ones just make their own lives harder, surely?
You've got kids - surely you find being an active parent as exhausting as I do?
Would be much easier to stick them in front of the telly all day and feed them pot noodles and biscuits
Did you read the bit where I said "as a group" in the middle of the bit you quoted?
It's not a generalisation, it's a fact. Individuals may fall outside the average, but "as a group" they under-perform.
Three-year-olds should be allowed to enjoy life. In general, their curiosity leads them to the learning when they are ready, although there's nothing wrong with a little push and direction. Note the word little in that last sentence.
The worst kids I know, personality-wise, have been pushed hard from birth, with tutors and the like.
[FnG]magnolia;26109682 said:It's astonishing that kids can grow up with such open minds given the closed state the parents often occupy.
[FnG]magnolia;26109682 said:It's astonishing that kids can grow up with such open minds given the closed state the parents often occupy.
Right. They do though. They really do.I didn't miss that at all.
You said as a group they underperform, I said they don't.
Probably worth looking up "statistically insignificant"And besides, the "starting group" at reception isn't static thorugh all school years - you get kids transitioning in and out of the group as they travel through the school system as family circumstances change - i.e. a dad loses his job, kids now entitled to free school meals - now that kid enters the "disadvantaged" group and attracts a pupil premium and another transitions out of the "disadvantaged" group because they get adopted into a nice stable family etc.
We aren't - we are a middle ranked country by that metric:As I said before, we as a country are actually ranked very highly in taking "disadvantaged" groups and working miracles with them compared to other countries,
BBC Article said:...ranking developed countries in terms of how well 15-year-olds performed in tests in reading, maths and science.
This showed the UK as a middle-ranking country, with Asian school systems, such as in Singapore, South Korea and Shanghai and Hong Kong in China, as the highest performers.
There doesn't HAVE to be "only so many resources". We can choose to increase funding for education, if we don't get resistance from those who believe "failings are on parents, and society shouldn't have to pick up the tab"....but it's often at the expense of other groups - there are only so many resources available and atm they are primarily dedicated to those "disadvantaged" groups. A school in inner London for example will get four times the funding per pupil and the best trained teachers (because they pay "golden hellos") compared to a "well to do" school and yet achieve a similar outcome in exam results.
I think this is an interesting article. My son is now 3 and 1/2 and from an early age, we've the time to read to him, as this invoked curiosity into how to speak & to teach him alphanumerics.
Now, he is able to count to 60 in singles, 10's and 20's. He can also recite the alphabet, identify letters in name and form letters into words using visual aids.
Personally, I think they should be doing more teaching in nursery's and preparing them for school. It's not unreasonable and makes educational sense.
What are your views?
You've got kids - surely you find being an active parent as exhausting as I do?
Would be much easier to stick them in front of the telly all day and feed them pot noodles and biscuits
[FnG]magnolia;26109682 said:It's astonishing that kids can grow up with such open minds given the closed state the parents often occupy.
[...]before I went to primary school I was reading full books and had a reading age of about 11.