Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,779
Nonse gets £4500 pay out
- Thread starter 4T5
- Start date
Yeah that one does, and the post you quoted was pointing out a scenario where that would be stupid. So they obviously could see the difference as well, unless you were agreeing with it.
It can be hard to tell through text sometimes.
But I am a Unicorn which makes me right.
Not paying your TV license is a serious offence I'll have you know, It could never & should never be describe as minor. I am disappoint.
lets 
get 
macho 
the 
keyboard 
and 
declare 
prison 
abuse 
proper 
Every one thinks this till you end up getting put in jail for something dumb and very trivial, yes what some people do is crazy but there still human being's and should be treated just the same as you would like to be treated.
It's easy to see that you've never been in or experienced prison life. What you're proposing is impossible.
Fortunately for you and the rest of society, the law doesn't work like this.
I agree with the person you quoted.
Rapists, kiddy fiddlers and murders do not deserve life. Someone who gets done for tax fraud...meh
Having read this thread it's clear that there are two lines of thought when considering this pay out. Morality and the law.
From a moral standpoint, I would want to see the money go to Milly Dowler's family and the other victims families.
From a legal standpoint, Levi Bellfield is entitled to the money.
If people aren't happy with Levi Bellfield getting this money, then maybe a petition at Change.org would be a route forward in getting the law changed.
From a moral standpoint, I would want to see the money go to Milly Dowler's family and the other victims families.
From a legal standpoint, Levi Bellfield is entitled to the money.
If people aren't happy with Levi Bellfield getting this money, then maybe a petition at Change.org would be a route forward in getting the law changed.
Last edited:
You can't have laws like this that waived because you don't like what the person has done. The laws have to apply to everyone or no one.
Law shouldn't apply to those that has a flagrant disregard for it...ie murders, kiddy fiddlers and rapists.
Line them up and shoot them. Why should anyone pay to keep these ***** in prison?
Laws are not made by people by having emotional reactions, and nor should they. Emotions have no place in law making.
So I say again, laws have to apply to no one, or everyone. It is a caveat of the system we use and are used to, but it's the way it is.
So I say again, laws have to apply to no one, or everyone. It is a caveat of the system we use and are used to, but it's the way it is.
Last edited:
The US has the death penalty in many states and figures show that the murder rate is usually higher in those states. Capital punishment is not a deterrent.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/murder-rates-nationally-and-state
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 May 2004
- Posts
- 4,488
- Location
- Tall building nearby
Regardless of the punishment these kinds of 'beings' are just not wired right and no end of gruesome threats would deter them from what they eventually do.
He sued the system, he probably could not claim criminal injuries compensation because he is barred from doing so in certain circumstances Link.
The legislation that allows him to sue should be governed in the same way the criminal injuries compensation system is where any claim is reduced by a factor of 1-10 depending on whatever crime the claimant has been convicted of.
He sued the system, he probably could not claim criminal injuries compensation because he is barred from doing so in certain circumstances Link.
The legislation that allows him to sue should be governed in the same way the criminal injuries compensation system is where any claim is reduced by a factor of 1-10 depending on whatever crime the claimant has been convicted of.
What proof of this do you have?
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2010
- Posts
- 18,482
- Location
- Sunny Sussex
We should have a whip round.
What does the scum get for £10k?
What does the scum get for £10k?