Nonse gets £4500 pay out

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4T5
  • Start date Start date
'Harry said:
I'll swap capital punishment for sticking kiddy fiddlers in with the general populace....that's a death sentence, just more brutal then death by lethal injection.

I know people who served serious time, they'd beat any kiddy fiddler from the first day they arrived, to they day they died.
Click to expand...

You wanted all paedos, rapists and murders lined up and shot, not lethal injection lol.
You also touted CP as a deterrent, surely being beaten to a pulp everyday, until you die is a deterrent by the same standards?
 
What I want to know is - what exactly can one do with £4,500 inside a prison? Sure, there's the tuck shop. I think prisoners can buy magazines, stamps, stationary. TV license is £1 per week. £4,500 is a huge sum of money for this kinda stuff. £200 for the prisoner and £4,300 for the victim's family would have been fairer IMO, and even then, £200 still goes a long way inside, especially when your average 40-hour inmate's job earns you £15 per week.
 
Monserrat said:
What I want to know is - what exactly can one do with £4,500 inside a prison? Sure, there's the tuck shop. I think prisoners can buy magazines, stamps, stationary. TV license is £1 per week. £4,500 is a huge sum of money for this kinda stuff. £200 for the prisoner and £4,300 for the victim's family would have been fairer IMO, and even then, £200 still goes a long way inside, especially when your average 40-hour inmate's job earns you £15 per week.
Click to expand...
I doubt her family would want the money tbh.
 
Guest2 said:
He's probably safer inside than out to be fair! His health and other peoples (childrens)
Click to expand...

The whole point is to exclude offenders from society with a secondary hope that they think twice about offending again. Or at least are too old to be a nuisance when they get out.

But not sure if you get it since two posts up you seem to be in favour of the point being to get harmed in prison :confused:
 
Gaygle said:
It's easy to see that you've never been in or experienced prison life. What you're proposing is impossible.
Click to expand...

Separate cells, 24/7 time inside cells.

Easy.

But i will never experience prison life, i really couldn't care less what happens in prisons, as it is not my responsibility.

Did the definition of impossible change?
 
BunnyKillBot said:
Bwhahahahaha. Another ocuk_alpha, murdering for you, so you dont have to.
Click to expand...

Hardly alpha. I'm just saying anyone inside would jump at the chance of getting rid of him

Prisons are paid for by tax payers arent they? So we are basically paying for pedophiles protection costs which are clearly not even adequate.

Where does the £4500 come from? Taxpayers?
 
I think what people miss is the simple fact that there are within each of the categories mentioned different levels of offender. For example murder, on the extreme ends of the spectrum there would be the psychopath who knocks people off in-between coffee breaks for no apparent reason. At the other end of this spectrum would be the person who through some kind of provocation killed someone in the heat of the moment while not meaning to.

The same would go for sex offenders, from the predatory paedophile or rapist to the idiot who just assumed a girl was of the age of consent.

There are too many subclasses of offence to apply arbitrary punishments to convicted people based on the main class of offence.

The death sentence will never be the right thing to apply, I think a future involving a long or even indefinite incarceration is the right thing. This allows for some attempt at correction of mistaken convictions and for those who were convicted correctly a miserable experience in a lousy environment.
 
platinum87 said:
Separate cells, 24/7 time inside cells.

Easy.

But i will never experience prison life, i really couldn't care less what happens in prisons, as it is not my responsibility.

Did the definition of impossible change?
Click to expand...

Put down the comic books and step away from the fish fingers.

24/7 in cells eh? I love how you act like you've sorted all the prison problems just by typing words, totally disregarding the fact that what you've written is, as usual, utter drivel.

it'd be akin to me saying "Hmmm, we need to lower CO2 emissions? Just stop all cars releasing CO2. SEE ITS NOT IMPOSSIBLE, DID THE DEFINITION OF IMPOSSIBLE CHANGE?!!11 LOLOLO"
 
As has already been said, the prison has a duty of care towards its prisoners and as such needs to be held accountable for not protecting an inmate.

The victim's original crime is irrelevant. It's up to the courts to administer justice, not existing inmates.
 
Gaygle said:
Put down the comic books and step away from the fish fingers.

24/7 in cells eh? I love how you act like you've sorted all the prison problems just by typing words, totally disregarding the fact that what you've written is, as usual, utter drivel.

it'd be akin to me saying "Hmmm, we need to lower CO2 emissions? Just stop all cars releasing CO2. SEE ITS NOT IMPOSSIBLE, DID THE DEFINITION OF IMPOSSIBLE CHANGE?!!11 LOLOLO"
Click to expand...

What you speak is drivel, what i say is extremely easy to do. The problems that exist are the result of people like you who are limited. So limited in fact to you having separate cells and isolating prisoners is some sort of drivel or fiction?

If you want to lower CO2 emissions you would probably best go about it by building more nuclear plants and various renewable energy.

If you were to replace all cars you'd still need to produce the energy to run them somewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom