Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 6,586
Robert
You are creating a dilemma for yourself.
Choosing which things to be stable at and what to ignore failure on.
Drawing back from the ragged edge to a point where your PC passes any test you set it would be better don't you think ?
Is that extra 100/200 Mhz really worth it when you know that you have instability running certain tasks ?
The difference between say 4.8 and 4.6 is not game changing and the benefit to you is peace of mind.
As it stands when you do run into problems running certain apps you cant be sure it isn't your OC rather than some iffy code that is the issue.
If he's only got instability running Prime, and only prime...then it's a non issue. It's a task he'll never run on his computer as it has no benefit, so i honestly don't see the fuss.
If he was sending out a preoverclocked system, to a paying customer then i would agree with you, as their list of tasks are unknown and they might for whatever reason run p95 day to day for lulz. so shaving off 100-200mhz makes sense.