It's agreed across the board that housing demand currently exceeds supply. The govt themselves admit it. Forecasts are that the gap between the two will widen in future years.
So, perhaps you guys would like to answer a simple question.
Let's assume that the people currently unable to buy a house were able to increase their income. Worked more overtime, got better jobs, etc (assuming that would even be possible for 100% of these people). Let's now assume that everybody could afford to buy a house.
Now let's remember that there aren't enough houses to go around.
Question: what happens to house prices, and indeed rents, in this case?
Who here is going to be brave enough to say "House prices and rents would not increase".
So there you have it. Even should everyone currently priced out of the market manage to double/triple/quadruple their income, still people would be unable to live in their own home. Landlords would make a killing, however.
Still waiting for an answer to this also.
If n% more people are competing for the same amount of houses, why wouldn't house prices rise n% until the same amount can afford as can today?