Arctic Silver 5 on H100i Application Question

Associate
Joined
16 Apr 2010
Posts
323
Hi All,

According to the AS5 producers website the product should be applied as a thin vertical line down the centre of the CPU. The few videos I've seen show me either a blob in the middle or a blob in the middle spread out with a credit card to cover the entire surface of the CPU.....which is preferred?

DK
 
I use AS5 as recommended by them for my CPU and never had any issues.

Each manufacturer has its own preferred option.
 
If you know the orientation of the cores under the IHS then the line method works best, if in doubt a blob will be adequate (can work better with some CPUs).

Spreading generally is a no no unless your using a paste designed to be spread like the gelid extreme as its easy to get trapped air bubbles and/or not full coverage of the geometry.
 
If you know the orientation of the cores under the IHS then the line method works best, if in doubt a blob will be adequate (can work better with some CPUs).

Spreading generally is a no no unless your using a paste designed to be spread like the gelid extreme as its easy to get trapped air bubbles and/or not full coverage of the geometry.

Is there a picture of the layout of the i7 920 cores?
 
why is it in RealTemp that Core 0 is always hotter than other cores?

Because it's doing more work, most processes will run on the first available core, which is usually core 0.

so a vertical line or a blob in the middle?

If AS are saying that you should apply their product in a specific way I think you should stick with their advice, they will have invested a lot of time and effort in testing the best application methods for their products.
 
I've been struggling with the application of MX-4 on my current build (a i3-4340 Dual Core) . I've had to redo it twice before I was satisfied that the technique and the amount I was using gave full/correct coverage.

Nobody here has mentioned tinting ie. spreading a small amount of TIM all over the CPU and heatsink contact plates then wiping it off with just a tissue/cloth until it appears smooth and clean. The plates should now have a matt surface and that is used as the base for the final application.

The idea, which has always seemed sensible to me, is that what is effectively an undercoat fills all the microscopic pits in the metal surfaces and the gaps between the pipes in direct contact coolers.

I've only done one other build so I was looking around for information about the best way to apply TIM for that at the time and came across this:-

http://archive.benchmarkreviews.com...sk=view&id=150&Itemid=62&limit=1&limitstart=4

The conclusion of the tests shown was that two thin lines of paste approx one third of the width of the CPU plate apart and each line half the length of the CPU plate gave the most even/full coverage. That is the technique I used with a syringe of MX-4 on both my builds but I found it VERY difficult to get right.

The problem is the width of the line seems to be determined by a combination the nozzle size of the syringe, the pressure used on the plunger, the angle and the speed you draw the lines.

Too many times the line starts fat and ends thin with a fine tail still attached to the nozzle which can and does go anywhere. Using a non-electrically conductive product should be mandatory.

Getting a single even width line with the quite runny MX-4 is difficult enough but two matched lines, correctly positioned really is an utter pain to do. I can well understand those who opt to blob instead.

There is also another question: whether to apply the TIM to the CPU or the heatsink?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom