Well mine was originally 1 month but they changed it to 3 after the guy who helped me look after our Citrix infrastructure left leaving just me with all the knowledge/the only one who could support it... They were scared I'd go the same way but to be honest I personally think its good for both sides.
3 months is of massive benefit to the employer, it means they hold all the cards.
That's what I'm hoping, but Shirley if it's in your employment contract then they can hold you to it?
That's what I'm hoping, but Shirley if it's in your employment contract then they can hold you to it?
What benefit did you get from this change? How can it possibily be good for both sides that they extend your notice period?There's nothing at all in that for you.
But doesn't the notice period also affect how long you're paid for if your company decides to make you redundant, in which case three months is better?
What benefit did you get from this change? How can it possibily be good for both sides that they extend your notice period?There's nothing at all in that for you.
Well in my case if they wanted rid of me for any reason then they'd have to give me 3 months notice or 3 months pay. Which would be awesome to have whilst I look for another job.
I really like my job and the company I work for so for me, the fact they did this shows me I'm a fairly valuable member of the team. Especially when most of those below me are only on 4 weeks notice. I guess its just the way different people look at it?
But doesn't the notice period also affect how long you're paid for if your company decides to make you redundant, in which case three months is better?
I was under the impression the legalities of notice periods means that if you wanted to leave a job you could - if you chose - walk out and leave whenever you want but you'd not get paid for your notice if you didn't serve it (or a reference, probably).