The video shows both vehicles travelling at 50mph on a dual carriageway when the car in front suddenly slams its brake on
The video doesn't appear to show that? The car slows in a manner controlled enough to allow a following goods vehicle to stop short.
When the accident was reported the driver of the blue Peugeot reported the driver as being at fault for the accident but using the video footage the system was able to exonerate the driver.
Which makes sense - the driver with the camera didn't hit the Peugeot. What it doesn't say is who WAS at fault - was it not the person who hit the truck?
As I've said previously, this is a weird one that doesnt shout 'CASH FOR CRASH' to me. Could be wrong but...


probably get bombarded by reviews in the search results 

