Two things which should be considered (which I doubt have been).
1. Vastly different methods of detection & ease of reporting.
2. The changing definition of what constitutes murder.
Simply put, comparing historical crime in which detection rates differed significantly from today's standards provides a meaningless statistic.
Utter rubbish.
For two key reasons.
1. A large number of people on here who are criticising UKIP actually vote Conservative (Who are not left wing).
2. The people who are on the political left don't have the same objections to other right wing political parties (IE, the Conseravatives).
These two things somewhat undermine your premise that the only reason UKIP are being attacked is because of some left-wing conspiracy. The reason UKIP are being attacked so viciously is because a notable population of it's voters & councillors keep saying racist, sexist, anti-disabled & homophobic things.
I disagree with a large number of right-wing voters on this forum on numerous issues & have never implied or thought they were racist.
Ironically, the very users on here who do have a history of making stupid, offensive, homophobic or racist comments are out in force declaring support for UKIP.
This leads back to what I said beforehand, while UKIP may not it'self be racist, it appeals to them (which the rest of the population is rightfully sceptical as to why that is).
Last edited:
