Sounds like it locking out gpu's for no reason then , One could even be suspicious and think there was a motive behind it
^^^
This
I approve of this limiting though. Force them down to high settings lmao.
Why do you approve?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Wolfenstein: The new order breaks 2gb
- Thread starter TheRealDeal
- Start date
^^^
This
Why do you approve?
It was a joke, hence the.
Can never tell with you sometimes
Well, I didn't break 2gb last night and that was using 4K
What were your fps ?
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 14,583
You sure you don't mean yester"year"?Indeed, 2gb is so yesterday
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 11,523
not yet, it has quite a few problems and is one of those console ports that makes almost no concessions for having been ported to PC
That's a bit unlucky for me, I have almost finished downloading it.
It's a good game actually. If you're a fan of the genre then you'll like it. As arc@css said, look at the thread in the PC games section of the forum.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,192
Those graphs concern me, no SLi/Crossfire support??
And Matt, even I'm not enough of an AMD fan to ignore that the 6GB guys are the master race
value for money on the other hand.....
And Matt, even I'm not enough of an AMD fan to ignore that the 6GB guys are the master race
value for money on the other hand.....2560x1600 with "Ultra" settings? Well... yeah i expect it would fail on 2Gb cards 
Don't you mean "1600p"?
I would be EXTREMELY surprised if 2Gb wasn't enough for 1920x1080. So much so i would call BS straight up.
Don't you mean "1600p"?
I would be EXTREMELY surprised if 2Gb wasn't enough for 1920x1080. So much so i would call BS straight up.
Last edited:
This is one of the drawbacks to increasing VRAM on new card designs, lazy developers get sloppy because they know they don't have to optimise properly for new cards and users of old cards suffer.
To be honest I have my reservations about the legitimacy of the review, not trying to be an apologist but they only told us that the 770 died at ultra and the 280X was fine, they didn't give any numbers. If the 280X was dipping to 45FPS at high settings then it would surely have been dipping lower at ultra? If one card fails to run at ultra and the other gets laggy then surely neither card is actually running the game at ultra so it's a mute point.
