Prepare tin foil hats - no planes hit the twin towers

Fox, do you believe the official story? Do you honestly believe there was no foul play by the American government? Just a question.

I'm not Fox obviously but I honestly believe there was no foul play by the American Government. I will concede that they were warned but didn't take it seriously.
I really don't understand why people want to take one of Allah's (Praise Be To Him) greatest victories away from him. 9/11 is celebrated every year in some Muslim parts of the world, probably in some British households too.
 
This probably goes without saying but groen (anything I don't mind) does not believe that man landed on the moon. Just so you can recalibrate your debating barometer.
 
no conspiracy to see here move along please, right along to Ukraine which the "us" west started and i have no idea why? whats happening? it's prolly about gas and pushing russia towrds china for some end game thingy, i dunno.
 
Utterly hilarious. Please, post some more stuff, I need a good laugh. Some people are so desperate to believe something different they become blinded as to how stupid they make themselves sound...

Also that missile is 4.7m in lenth with a 2.4m wingspan, a 757 which actually hit the towers is 54m long with a wingspan of 38. Bit of a difference there.
 
It was dinosaurs that did it.

dinosaur+plane.jpg

#iknowthetruth
 
I'm serious guys, I've counted like 8 different men of honour posting in this thread.

What gives? Why am I in your crosshairs? What has your 'organisation' got against me?
 
[FnG]magnolia;26342713 said:
This probably goes without saying but groen (anything I don't mind) does not believe that man landed on the moon. Just so you can recalibrate your debating barometer.

He's got worse, way worse.
 
[FnG]magnolia;26342713 said:
This probably goes without saying but groen (anything I don't mind) does not believe that man landed on the moon. Just so you can recalibrate your debating barometer.
Do you know, I can't imagine why, but I'd just gone ahead and assumed that. :D

Of course, then I realised my unimaginative mistake, and came to the conclusion that he did believe in the moon landings until the lizard people put some mind control electronics in his coco pops. The moon landings really didn't happen, of course, but they specifically wanted him to not believe in them so his spot on analysis of 9/11 would seem less credible. It seemed like a simpler and less prone to error way of controlling him rather than just killing him.
 
I do believe there are many layers to 9/11. Always have. I also believe the very first and most obvious conspiracy people think of (planes were switched/remote controlled/controlled demolition) is exactly how it was designed, to be a distraction.

I fully agree with the videos 6+7 that 'anything i don't mind' posted earlier in the thread and below.. there were no planes. The evidence really is heavy to support it. The biggest ney say against would be all the people that 'saw' the planes. But just having abit of psychological understanding behind me makes it easy to see how people just agree with it.. 'I hear a big bang and it exploded'.. "No no I saw it on tv a plane hit it".. 'Oh my god a plane!?'.... Second plane hits.. 'Oh I love america there was another plane'.. 'I'm going to lie and say I saw it because everyone else saw it and I dont want to be left out of the biggest thing thats ever happened'.

However, If you're still with me then I don't think it ends there...

So, so far we have two buildings with the top floors on fire and weakened from explosives. Now, thats not enough to bring them down. We need more explosives. But, what's going to happen when they've fallen to the ground and we have a joint 220 floors of destruction to clear up. How can we be sure just 1, just a single explosive couldn't fail and it be found in what will be a humongous pile of broken building. You cant. If just 1 was found, if just 1 bit of metal showing explosive was found, if the building just blew up and fell to the floor in all that destruction, the question of engine remains would be so much heavier.

But how do you get rid of all the evidence? You disintegrate it. Enter Dr. Judy Wood.


If you really want to get technical, watch it. Theres a lot of interesting stuff in that video, not all I necessarily agree or even fully understand as it gets pretty complex and sciencey.

However if you dont have time to watch it all, then skip to 48:30 and watch for a few minutes of the disintegration or 'dustification'.. However before you do, forget everything you think about the towers.. forget that its on fire, forget explosives and just ask yourself what you are seeing with your own eyes, not what someone has told you you're seeing.

But what the hell could do that? DEM. Directed Energy Weapon. Probably satellite but I honestly dont know. At this point, if you start searching for DEM's and 9/11 in the same context you're pretty deep down the rabbit hole.. and your'll notice you start finding dead ends and lack of information that should be available in places.

However, eventually, it all ends, and began with the Hutchison Effect.. Mr John Hutchison.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok i think i found the doc i could not found its in a playlist

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEA05F393EC843D80
 
Back
Top Bottom