I didn't say TressFX doesn't perform well on Nvidia GPUs these days (Gameworks HBAO performs almost identically on AMD hardware btw). I said that AMD does not allow the Nvidia optimized versions to be posted:
Lauritzen:
The only GameWorks feature in Watch dogs performs almost identically on AMD and Nvidia hardware.
Also on the stealth advertising program;
One thing about marketing is that people are supposed to know when they're being marketed to. This is a law in many countries. Which is why we have notes about product placement in TV shows, movies etc.
Nvidia's focus group was really bad back when they were doing their thing undercover. But these days they have to identify that they're a part of that group.
Here's NV's policy apparently:
AMD's similar program on the other hand has no such requirements. And such stealth marketing is indeed illegal in some parts of the world.
Most of the blog posts, reddit articles etc. that were directly from AMD have since then been deleted (for obvious reasons) but fortunately there are some copies of them out there: http://alienbabeltech.com/abt/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=24247
AMD even has online leaderboards for people they've recruited to their programs: https://northamericaninfluencer.amd.com/Leaderboard/View/1
However you never see these people identifying themselves on forums etc. where they are doing the promotional work.
Lauritzen:
http://beyond3d.com/showthread.php?p=1850372#post1850372For instance while they seem to unofficially "say" that game devs are allowed to modify the TressFX code (although they have no license to say as much), they will not allow other IHVs to post optimized versions.
The only GameWorks feature in Watch dogs performs almost identically on AMD and Nvidia hardware.
Also on the stealth advertising program;
One thing about marketing is that people are supposed to know when they're being marketed to. This is a law in many countries. Which is why we have notes about product placement in TV shows, movies etc.
Nvidia's focus group was really bad back when they were doing their thing undercover. But these days they have to identify that they're a part of that group.
Here's NV's policy apparently:
"Our official stance is that employees are allowed to speak about our technologies and partners as long as they disclose they work for NVIDIA, and that their opinions are their own, not necessarily those of the company. Employees must disclose their relationship to NVIDIA whenever they talk about topics related to us. Also, we do not condone mudslinging against competitors.
AMD's similar program on the other hand has no such requirements. And such stealth marketing is indeed illegal in some parts of the world.
Most of the blog posts, reddit articles etc. that were directly from AMD have since then been deleted (for obvious reasons) but fortunately there are some copies of them out there: http://alienbabeltech.com/abt/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=24247
Our research indicates that consumers are highly persuaded by online experts and personalities, hence AMD’s advocacy marketing focus. These key influencers are AMD technology enthusiasts that are well respected in their communities: Twitter, Facebook, forums, blogs, etc.
Consumers are seeking advice from the very experts and personalities that we target. This is an example of not only aligning the troops but also providing the perfect tactic on the chosen battlefield.
At AMD, we are not only aligning resources to this trend, we are storming the online castle, kindling the fire of change, and making new friends, Facebook friends.
AMD even has online leaderboards for people they've recruited to their programs: https://northamericaninfluencer.amd.com/Leaderboard/View/1
However you never see these people identifying themselves on forums etc. where they are doing the promotional work.