• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

TitanZ (SLI) Vs 295x2

Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
45,177
Location
United Kingdom
At least someone had the balls to review the two dual card beasts.

Battlefield 4

faOFuHp.jpg


HIzeOLs.jpg


owR83vk.jpg


Crysis 3

p1pLQdf.jpg


Wh9IJ4m.jpg


MzzyW4h.jpg


Battlefield 3

AJy4pps.jpg


gbYLaiz.jpg


IdFMaU8.jpg


TL : DR - 295x2 wins by a landslide in most titles.

Full Review
http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/5417/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-z-sli-review-tones-tizair-systeem
 
Last edited:
Are they running that 4960x at stock???

I know the single card results wouldn't change much if it was clocked but their quad readings would.
 
Nice to have some benches at last!! And to know that my cards will only be a few fps off the 290X Xfire scores (the Tri-X OC cards tend to sit between stock 290 and 290X Xfire)

:cool:
 
This seems a pointless comparison. They are showing the figures for Titan Z in SLI but not showing figures for 295x2 in Crossfire

Ie Quad GPU vs Quad GPU

Even as a fan of the green camp this makes me mad!
 
Pretty much destroys the red competition, but what is the point when you cant afford one (let alone 2) to gloat about it:p
I have to say if I was going amd route I may get 2-3 290's rather than the 295. Just seems to make more sense.
 
Pretty much destroys the red competition, but what is the point when you cant afford one (let alone 2) to gloat about it:p
I have to say if I was going amd route I may get 2-3 290's rather than the 295. Just seems to make more sense.

I think you are reading it wrong, the Purple is 2 Titan-Z in Quad SLI, there is no Quadfire comparisons in that charts, they should have done 2x 295 for Quadfire, the Single Titan-Z in Blue gets hammered.
 
Last edited:

First TitanZ Vs 295x2 results ive seen that cover a lot of games to be fair. But yeah, it wins by a landslide. I think we all knew that would be the case though.

Of course it does, otherwise you wouldn't have made this thread :p

I saw it posted at oc.net, there was no chance of it beating a 295x2 though Jono so i guess we'll never know. ;) :p

This seems a pointless comparison. They are showing the figures for Titan Z in SLI but not showing figures for 295x2 in Crossfire

Ie Quad GPU vs Quad GPU

Even as a fan of the green camp this makes me mad!

At least it makes the TitanZ look good in that regard, it's top of the charts. Would probably be on the Nvidia black list if they put it up against Dual 295x2 and lost. (and they would lose) They could only be saved in most titles if crossfire was not working. At high res, with XDMA and a 512bit bus its just too much in favour of the 295x2. At 1080P things are a bit closer between the Z and x2.
 
Last edited:
don't think eitehr of them scale well at all but there are some pros to spending that money if you desire. I'll stick top my 780ti tho
 
Forget the results on the red team...the Titan Z's results look pathetic even when comparing to SLI Titan Black. Despite having the same two GPUs, the low clock speed really does seem to hurt its performance.

The cost of Titan Z is enough for people buy pair of Titan Black with a top-end motherboard and a 1500W PSU (and a new case if require) with changes to spare :rolleyes:
 
Here's "value" summary of some of the cards involved in the review. I thin we all know that value goes out the window on all top end cards but this gives nice visual representation.

CostperGBP_zpsb83d1cc3.jpg


Titan Black doesn't do to badly for multiple monitor gaming but at the moment AMD are well ahead in terms of 4K gaming in terms of drivers so maybe Nvidia can catch up down the road.
 
Back
Top Bottom