Father with 26 children by 15 women has ‘received £500,000 in benefits’
- Thread starter Efour
- Start date
forget that, check this out in the links underneth.. http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/19/forget-the-g-string-the-c-string-is-here-4768902/
not the bloke wearing it though
the youtube clip is LOL
forget that, check this out in the links underneth.. http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/19/forget-the-g-string-the-c-string-is-here-4768902/
not the bloke wearing it though
ill buy two! Need a scarier costume for Halloween 
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 9,871
- Location
- UK
Now that's far more interesting.
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 10,938
followed by...
So it's the government's fault they making scrounging so lucrative and easy, but then complains when they make it less attractive?
It doesn't seem like an inconsistent viewpoint. The system has made it so he's much better off staying at home unemployed. When they take that away... who is going to employ him and pay him enough to make up the difference?
I struggle to get angry at "benefit scroungers" when the system is set up to make certain segments of society better off claiming benefits than going out and working. I get angry at a benefits system that creates this welfare trap, and inevitably when someone tries to fix the welfare trap, they end up closing said trap on those caught in it.
If I were in charge, I'd implement the negative income tax system. Combine tax and welfare into a single system, cut a huge amount of admin work, and make it so that any given person will always be better off working than not. It boggles the mind that no politician has ever had the stones to implement it.
The flaw in that argument being that "the system" didn't force him to have 26 kids he couldn't afford to support.
forget that, check this out in the links underneth.. http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/19/forget-the-g-string-the-c-string-is-here-4768902/
not the bloke wearing it though
C is clearly for ****, which is what you'll look like wearing one.
