Huge TV as monitor?

Associate
Joined
23 Sep 2010
Posts
218
I'm thinking about buying a 60" or perhaps even a 65" 1080p TV and using it as a monitor because I would like to use my computer from the sofa and having one screen that functions as both a TV and monitor sounds like a good idea.

I gather that the main drawback to using a TV is the input lag - it would primarily be used for programming and web browsing, would this still be an issue? Are there any other drawbacks that I need to consider? Any general comments are also very welcome.
 
Why not get a smaller screen, something like 22" just for programming, I cant imagine reading lines of code on a 1080p 60" TV.
 
There you go:
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/input-lag

Just pick a suitable size and check the reviews. For the last two years, Sony has been gathering the top spots with regards to input lag.

For programming and web browsing, anything below 30-35ms should be more than fine. Anything under 20ms should be fine even for gaming.

Ps. Using a 42" Philips HDTV from a 1m distance. (otherwise a fine set, but it has relatively high input lag (~40ms) and semi-annoying color banding)

Ps2. Don't buy Philips, it seems like their software engineers are amateurs or something. They break more than they fix, and they mostly fix the non-critical niche issues. Or re-introduce old bugs, so they can fix them again.
 
My 50" 1080p TV is awful to use as a monitor using my HTPC in bed (end of the bed is only 2ft away). I have to zoom in on web pages to see it clearly. Browsing folders etc really isn't easy on the eyes.
 
Thanks - VERY interesting responses!

I appreciate the input lag concerns (thanks for the link aatu!) but other responses seem to suggest that the resolution will be an issue when reading text?

According to the following chart, you should see no reduction in picture quality for a 1080p 60" screen at 8ft, which is roughly the setup that I'm thinking of. Or is there more to it than that? Is reading text still likely to be an issue?

I'm also unsure as to why this setup might be bad for gaming. Most TVs at this size are 100Hz or more, so as long as I can find one with relatively low input lag I would have thought that it would be brilliant in this regard?

** No hotlinking images, thank you **
 
Most TVs at this size are 100Hz or more, so as long as I can find one with relatively low input lag I would have thought that it would be brilliant in this regard?

Dont be fooled by TV Hz specs. They only accept 60hz input no matter what. The 100hz rating is the output including interpolation. Basically they take 60hz input, add in frames that don't exist to smooth motion and then output it as "100hz". Its mainly to smooth out sports but it bad for everything else, it produces whats called the soap opera effect if you watch a movie with it on.
 
Dont be fooled by TV Hz specs. They only accept 60hz input no matter what. The 100hz rating is the output including interpolation. Basically they take 60hz input, add in frames that don't exist to smooth motion and then output it as "100hz". Its mainly to smooth out sports but it bad for everything else, it produces whats called the soap opera effect if you watch a movie with it on.

Ah. So a '100Hz' TV receiving 100 FPS from my computer would only actually be taking 60 of those frames and then upscaling using interpolation? Are you saying that all (mainstream) TVs only accept 60Hz inputs?

Sorry if these are basic questions - it sounds like there is an awful lot of marketing to cut through :/
 
Ah. So a '100Hz' TV receiving 100 FPS from my computer would only actually be taking 60 of those frames and then upscaling using interpolation? Are you saying that all (mainstream) TVs only accept 60Hz inputs?

Sorry if these are basic questions - it sounds like there is an awful lot of marketing to cut through :/

Yep that's exactly how it works.
 
I gather that the main drawback to using a TV is the input lag - it would primarily be used for programming and web browsing, would this still be an issue? Are there any other drawbacks that I need to consider? Any general comments are also very welcome.

I was using a 40" HDTV last year for two or so years for my main monitor and played games from CSS, COD, BF series, L4D series and all the other games out there.

Never had problems with input lag or any problems with reading text on the screen, it just acted as a other monitor.
 
I used a 40inch TV for a few years and thought it was okay. Went to a 144hz monitor and my improvement in FPS games was immense. Other than that though, games with a joypad are great on it, sitting on the sofa. I notice low framerate more than lag in that situation, PC games on TV with graphics maxed out at 60hz look awesome compared to awful upscaled console games at 30fps...

For programming or doing any real work with a PC these days I would think two or three cheaper screens on a desktop would be the better way to go?
 
@MoonBoots:

There is no universal "perfect" resolution or "bad" resolution. Viewing comfort with 65" and 1080p depends entirely on your own eye sight and viewing distance. It could be that the text is too small, but it might alternatively be too big. You'll just have to see for yourself.

First things first: for HDTVs, there's not that many resolutions to choose from, it's pretty much either 720p (HD Ready), 1080p (Full HD) or 4k (Ultra HD). I'd recommend going with 1080p for now.

IIRC correctly, the recommended viewing distance for work-related stuff is 1.3-1.5x the display device's size in diagonal, with 1x usually stated as the bare minimum. If you get closer than that, you'll have to start physically moving your head around to actually see what's happening on the sides of the display area. For movies, etc. 2-2.5x is recommended. For average, let's take something like 1.8x. For 8ft, that adds up to about a 53" television. Your 65" diagonal size and 8ft viewing distance would amount to 1.5x, so it's still within bounds, but more distance probably wouldn't hurt. If you have ample space to increase the viewing distance, then no worries. But if the 8ft is the maximum distance you can get into, then I'd stay below 55" and adjust the distance to something smaller, if need be. You should maintain breathing room to both directions, as you can't alter your own eye sight nor the diagonal size afterwards, let alone resolution. Distance is basically the key component with which you can adjust the viewing comfort.

Nevertheless, not ALL televisions are good for computer usage. And I'm not talking about input lag here; some sets have unavoidable "features", like edge sharpening, dynamic contrast, etc., which can deteriorate the overall image quality. Some of them might be good for videos, but usually bad for computer stuff. You'll have to read reviews to get more info on how each set is suited for computer usage.

And like someone already said:
HDTVs are indeed more than 99% of the time limited to 50/60Hz input, while the output can be 100/120Hz. Though this might not always guarantee motion interpolation, either. They might advertise "200Hz" HDTVs, which in reality are just 60Hz panels with strobing backlight, without any sort of motion interpolation in place. In any case, your computer will still recognize it as 60Hz HDTV, regardless whether these sort of extra features are enabled or disabled. And thus the computer won't even TRY to send a 100Hz signal to the set.

For example, my own set is advertised as "700Hz", which combines strobing backlight, motion interpolation, and various other settings, some of which have actually nothing to do with hertzes. In reality, it's a 100Hz panel, but still limited to the common 60Hz input signal.

BUT: there are unofficial methods to "unlock" 100/120Hz even at input level. But this doesn't work with all products.
 
Wow. Thanks so much aatu - that is an unbelievably helpful post!

The viewing distance question is an interesting one by the sounds of it. Unfortunately I think I'd want to sit close to the screen when working or web browsing and significantly further away when watching video which makes my idea of a one screen solution less attractive. I suppose I could attempt to get around this by increasing the scaling in Windows to make text more readable at a distance.

It is also very interesting to hear that certain features of TVs can actually reduce picture quality for PC use. Ironically, it sounds like cheaper TVs with less image processing may actually be more appropriate as a result of this!

I'll do some investigation into unlocking - would be ideal if I could force the TV to accept a higher frame rate input.
 
A projector might be worth considering. Most are true 120hz and with all the image processing turned off I think they would be much latency than most TV's.
 
Back
Top Bottom