She needs to be stopped!!!

This girl is going to end up being more diversive than is ideal,

One side is going to see the dead bunnies, get upset and run to FaceTard to like something and save the world.


The other side is going to see a Texan cheerleader - with a gun.

And this is one of those niche areas where it is borderline porn for NRA Americans, they love girls with guns. She could be disembowelling orphan bambis and they would still fap over her gunrack till it fell off.

Neither side is going to listen to the other.
 
While hunting big game for fun doesn't appeal to me, I do see why it is an important part of the tourism that helps to sustain wildlife conservation. Sustainable hunting is a good thing, even when the participants have no interest in conservation.
If people didn't pay so much to shoot a helpless cat, many private wildlife reserves would be cattle ranches instead, which would be far more tragic.

Besides, I occasionally choose to eat meat so I've waived my right to protest against any form of sustainable hunting.
 
She has an unusual face! As long as they were shot legally i have no issues.

For Example: Often reserves will offer lion shooting if the lion is old or overly aggressive. They cull these to allow the younger lions to move up the pride and keep the gene pool fresh.

She's an idiot by posting it as idiots react to it
 
The great thing about conservation is, it takes only a very small number of people to wipe out an entire ecosystem, but literally hundreds of people and vast amounts of money to preserve them.

Hence why conservation is a complete waste of time. We may as well admit defeat, and face up to the reality that this world is completely ****ed.

There is no sign that our continued destruction is even slowing down, let alone able to be stopped.

People think I'm weird for hoping for some kind of (targetted) biological plague that wipes out humanity. But it would be for the best, all things considered.
 
The great thing about conservation is, it takes only a very small number of people to wipe out an entire ecosystem, but literally hundreds of people and vast amounts of money to preserve them.

Hence why conservation is a complete waste of time. We may as well admit defeat, and face up to the reality that this world is completely ****ed.

There is no sign that our continued destruction is even slowing down, let alone able to be stopped.

People think I'm weird for hoping for some kind of (targetted) biological plague that wipes out humanity. But it would be for the best, all things considered.

why? no offence but you are vastly over estimating the importance of humans and our impact, lots of things have changed the earth far more than us and lots of animals destroy ecosystems too.

and besides the earth devoid of tigers pandas elephants rhinos zebras lions and pretty much every other endangered animal will still turn will still support life and is no different to the millions of other species that have gone extinct.

admittedly if we decided we we wanted to wipe out plankton then we'd be removing a species that would have an actual impact, but i dont see a save the plankton society
 
why? no offence but you are vastly over estimating the importance of humans and our impact, lots of things have changed the earth far more than us and lots of animals destroy ecosystems too.

and besides the earth devoid of tigers pandas elephants rhinos zebras lions and pretty much every other endangered animal will still turn will still support life and is no different to the millions of other species that have gone extinct.

admittedly if we decided we we wanted to wipe out plankton then we'd be removing a species that would have an actual impact, but i dont see a save the plankton society

Because we are capable of more than this. If we chose to, we could preserve our planet and its other inhabitants.

If we choose not to, then what kind of people are we?

Your argument seems to be "even if we **** up this world, a few millennia after we're gone it'll (probably) recover."

That's pretty weak.
 
If you're American, firing a gun is basically better than sex.

Killing a defenceless animal can make even the most pathetic piece of trailer trash feel like Hercules.

Indeed. I hope the next time she's taking aim at some lions her gun jams and they are particularly hungry that day.

And if one of them could pose over her mangled teeth and take a selfie and upload it that would be great.
 
Yep not strict veggie, but enough as it's easier to call myself one as I do generally eat a LOT of veg, and say veggie + some fish (Though fish is occasional as I do it on a budget probably more of a treat than anything).
Still though, you're not a vegetarian, and as such shouldn't call yourself one. If people are ignorant to the term pescatarian it's because of situations like this.



Think about it for a second why a vegan diet is super healthy based on something we should all eat more of that vegans mostly survive on (force themselves to eat).

Vegan diets aren't super healthy though. People should eat more veg, that's for sure but vegans often have it the other way, because they're eating nothing but plant based food, they are lacking in nutrition in other areas. Vegan diets aren't automatically "super healthy" because they're vegan or are eating nothing but veg, a vegan diet may be better than a typical meat eater's diet simply because the vast majority of meat eaters are not health conscious and don't care what they eat. They consider microwave ready meals to be good eating.

If you compare a health conscious meat eater, who follows a good diet and is as meticulous about what they eat as a vegan, to a vegan, the vegan will be the one lacking in health 9 times out of 10.
 
Because we are capable of more than this. If we chose to, we could preserve our planet and its other inhabitants.

If we choose not to, then what kind of people are we?

Your argument seems to be "even if we **** up this world, a few millennia after we're gone it'll (probably) recover."

That's pretty weak.


we really arnt that capable. i mean i suppose your right we are cable of commuting genocide against all of the advanced civilizations but thats kinda ****y.

after all think of all the destruction caused just so you can have that pc to post about how much destruction we're causing thats pretty weak.

oh and the woman in the op is pretty much the only person in this thread whose activly doing what you say we should be doing by conserving the other inhabitants. you're the problem, you're a simple consumer what do you do to stop this?

Your argument seems to be "even if we **** up this world, a few millennia after we're gone it'll (probably) recover."

No my argument is we're not ****ing up this word we're changing it quite slightly compared to previous species.

you want the ones who really ****ed up the worlds you want to go after those evil plants which radically changed the composition of our atmosphere resulting in the massive devastation of the previous eco system.
 
The WWF hunt animals? Really? I don't seem to see that mentioned in their sponsorship packs they send me? Do they promote said hunts with pictures of trophies?

PETA don't advertise what they really do with the animals they "save" (They kill A LOT of animals on a daily basis just because they don't think they should be pets). I would expect the vast majority of PETA supporters have no idea that they do this sort of stuff.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-j-winograd/peta-kills-puppies-kittens_b_2979220.html
 
qRNYjr9.jpg


lol

That forehead screams Predator; hate to be her dentist.
 
Back
Top Bottom