Yeah wording isn't very clear but it looks like it means you have an approx 24 hour window in which to pay either before or after using the crossing which is progress IMO.
So long as it's clearly signed, this should be fine.
Yeah wording isn't very clear but it looks like it means you have an approx 24 hour window in which to pay either before or after using the crossing which is progress IMO.
Daft idea.
Purely to make money.
Use the traffic story to get public support.
save a load of money on staff salaries
Then shrug when traffic remains the same for all the reasons stated above and run off to the bank.
What is long needed is the removal of the toll as the crossing is long paid for.

They've just started a Toll-by-plate scheme here, takes a picture of your licence plate and they send you the toll in the mail... $1.25 to go through it.... $2.50 admin fee! ludicrous. (I live right near a toll road, luckily there's a road next to it I use to get to work without paying)
do you ever drive along toll booths ?
They are a massive cause of congestion and very very annoying. Anywhere in the world.
Every time I've been abroad and had to pay toll at a booth, ( France, Poland, etc...) it slowed you down by a good couple of minutes at best ( when it's deserted), or sometimes you are stuck in the jam in front of it for over 30 minutes.
Do you ever drive along toll booths ?
They are a massive cause of congestion and very very annoying. Anywhere in the world.
Every time I've been abroad and had to pay toll at a booth, ( France, Poland, etc...) it slowed you down by a good couple of minutes at best ( when it's deserted), or sometimes you are stuck in the jam in front of it for over 30 minutes.
This makes me so angry.
We were told that when a suitable time had elapsed that the charge would be removed, once enough money had been made to pay for the building and then subsequent maintenance of the tunnel.
Then instead of scrapping the toll they increased the charge, stating the booths had to remain in place to ensure the traffic flow was kept at a steady flow.
Not that has gone out of the window and they are removing the booths which is simply as they have worked out how to charge without needing to employ anyone.
I've never queued for more than 2 minutes in the US and by far the longest was the "toll booths" for Disney carparks. Actual toll roads it's usually no queue or less than a minute.
I know about these ''ghost traffic jams''/''brake waves'' as we call them here, does the motorway itself have insufficient capacity there then ? It looks like there are very few toll booths for the amount of lanes of traffic over there.Yes I do.
my comments still stand. We are not dealing with a toll on a flat bit of same width road.
The pinch point is the crossing. The booths just sit in front of it and take the blame. See what happens when they are gone.
Whilst working at an engineering firm I was shown a few advanced traffic models. Take a three lane circle with free flowing traffic. Add one driver braking slightly and the wave through the traffic is amazing to see.
The crossing will cause people to brake, even slightly and combined with a heavy flow of traffic this will cause a jam that will only get worse till the traffic flow entering the jam reduces enough to counter the slowdown
This... just think of all the money they are going to loose.Possibly a silly question, how will they police all of the foreign vehicles that go through it every day?
This. I personally don't see why we have tolls in the UK since we pay road tax, unless you have a microscopic diseasel.![]()

Possibly a silly question, how will they police all of the foreign vehicles that go through it every day?