your opinion isn't valid so you are not allowed to think that, please erase your opinion and do not think it as it is against the rules
Oh look, you know how to put forth a strawman argument. Why am I not surprised?
your opinion isn't valid so you are not allowed to think that, please erase your opinion and do not think it as it is against the rules
Dolph has a lot to answer for tbh.
Oh look, you know how to put forth a strawman argument. Why am I not surprised?
Lighten up mate i was just making light of your extremist views thats all
My views aren't extreme, you just don't understand them, genuinely.
I am not telling you what you can and can't think, I am saying that "my opinion" isn't a valid claim and defence for saying things that aren't true. A lot of people use this tactic and believe that because they are "entitled" to an opinion, that they can run their mouth, talk about stuff they don't understand and just be in general highly ignorant, and that because it's "their opinion" that it's okay.
Surely the real question is whether what you are not not thinking is not the same one doesn't not say?
It is not NOT how you say it but how you do not say it or not
TBH i couldn't care less what happens in the middle east, they have been at each others throughts for centuries and always will
two pages of you arguing say contrary.
your not one of these fellas are you?![]()
![]()
http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/govern...nda-war-hits-social-media-20140717-ztvky.html
It's not my opinion, it's objective that someone saying something that isn't true, can't legitimately claim that what they've said is valid just because it's their opinion. Hence the concept of invalid opinions.
No one mentioned valid opinions, it was you that said people can't have an opinion if you do not agree with it ?
Everyone doesn't have the right to an opinion. You have no rights to an opinion that isn't informed. Your "opinions" are not informed. In other words you can not have an opinion if i do not agree with it
Can you point out where I've said that?
When you have to change what I've said to back up your "argument" you've started down the road of strawman fallacies.
Aside from that, the whole issue here is that you seemingly don't understand what an informed opinion actually is.
It's irrelevant as to whether people agree or disagree with an invalid/uninformed "opinion" it doesn't impact whether it's true or not.
You cannot make untrue claims about things and use "but it's my opinion to try and claim that what you've said is valid.
You can't validly claim that someone who is tall, is short, just with "but my opinion". Do you see how that works? If someone is tall it doesn't matter who disagrees or agrees with the claim, it's not a valid claim.