I'm currently looking at 120/144hz and 240hz, but I'm not sure if there's a point in 240hz. While I was doing some reading on 120hz/144hz, I've come across G-Sync and lightboost which apparently give the same visual effect as the old good CRT monitors.
Now my pc is 3 years old, (spec listed below) even though I mainly play FPS games on low settings. Most of the time I get around 100fps on BF3 or 150-210fps in CS:GO and IMO there should be a noticeable difference going from 60hz.
My PC Spec:
i5 [email protected]
Asus P8Z68-V rev. B3
2x4gb 1600mhz 1.5v
HIS IceQ 7950 1050/1400
I don't have a budget for the monitor yet, as I need to find out whenever lightboost or G-Sync will be worth extra £££'s over normal 120/144hz monitor.
Now my pc is 3 years old, (spec listed below) even though I mainly play FPS games on low settings. Most of the time I get around 100fps on BF3 or 150-210fps in CS:GO and IMO there should be a noticeable difference going from 60hz.
My PC Spec:
i5 [email protected]
Asus P8Z68-V rev. B3
2x4gb 1600mhz 1.5v
HIS IceQ 7950 1050/1400
I don't have a budget for the monitor yet, as I need to find out whenever lightboost or G-Sync will be worth extra £££'s over normal 120/144hz monitor.
Last edited: