The Employment Tribunal Chairman concluded that the employer's calculation was correct. The EAT said that was wrong and that the Tribunal should have "grossed up" the entitlement to 10 days holiday based on two working weeks to 14 calendar days to take into account the two weekends. The contract of employment was not suspended between Friday and Monday although the obligation to work did not arise. The amounts should be grossed up to a seven day week and they referred in particular to the calculation of holiday pay in Regulation 16 in The Working Time Regulations and a week's pay under the Employment Rights Act. They also disapproved of a method of calculation which varied with the length of a particular calendar month.
The EAT decide that the correct way of calculating holiday pay due to an applicant on termination of employment where 10 days holiday was owed is to divide gross annual salary by 365 to give a day's pay and then to multiply that by 14. In this case increasing the amount of money owed to the Applicant by £200. This case is of considerable assistance to those calculating amounts due on termination and shows the financial significance of getting the calculation right.
What you've written contradicts what you have linked to in quite an important way. From the link;
Why is it being multiplied by 14?
Is that not the same as paying based on days work. As 10days. Is the same as 14 days(including unworked). I'm confused by that.

Why is it being multiplied by 14?
Is that not the same as paying based on days work. As 10days. Is the same as 14 days(including unworked). I'm confused by that.
No it doesn't...
The multiplication by 14 is seven fifths of 10
It's only being multiplied by 14 because in this case the holiday pay is 10 days, it wouldnt be the same for the OP

you could argue both ways, but it really depends on your contract because you're on a salary rather than hourly rate. With a salary you're getting paid to cover x hours over y days, not so much an hour.
How I understand it is:
If your contract states you only work Mon-Fri then you are right in that your salary is for 5 out of 7 days a week and the 39k is for the 261 days
However if you have a salary where it doesn't state mon-friday only your contract is likely x hours spread over 7 days a week, it's just how you've been scheduled into work your hours Mon-Fri, this doesn't mean you are only working 5 days a week.
This would be HR's method, and as you've found out, it works out in their favour financially.
A perfect example of how a 'salary' can be 'funky' when it comes to holiday pay...
My mum works in a school, she has an hourly rate for her work but the actual total yearly pay is divided into monthly payments because they don't get paid over the school holidays.
Note I'm no legal expert, this is just my understanding etcSo going back to this - my contract states that I work 37.5 hours a week and that I work shifts. Slight confusion on my behalf here because I was promoted 12 months ago from working a pervious 4 years within the same company. I have always worked 8-4 mon-fri BUT my contract does now state shifts at 37.5hrs a week.
My annual holidays are expressed in hours but I have only ever taken them as expressed in days, therefore I do not know how many hours they class as a 'day' I'm assuming 7.5hrs.
Now I had an addition in my contract that details payment when termination of employment has occurred and it says;
basically gives them the right to screw you over without any consequences...side note argument - you could argue your employment hasn't been terminated, you're leaving, slight difference in my opinion because termination means fired in my view.Now I had an addition in my contract that details payment when termination of employment has occurred and it says;
The payment in lieu will be calculated at your daily rate of pay.
Like I said I'm guessing they're taking the simple approach of 39k/365 for a day rate, which would be 5.35 hours per day, but as we all know that isn't how it works for most of us but I'm sure the business realised they could save money this way.
using that basis it would work out at the £1068 for 10 days...
They are, deliberately I imagine, mixing both methods (salary/365 and salary/261) and using salary/365 to get a weeks pay based on a 7 day week. Then making holiday pay salary/365*5 per week.
If should either be, salary/365*7 or salary/261*5
If you book a weeks leave and your remaining entitlement reduces by the equivalent of 7 days then they are correct. If not they can whistle.
I would go in tomorrow, tell the HR manager you have spoken to ACAS and they are working out annual leave wrongly and see what they say...
... Where's the 20k come from?
Done this and even though they are agreeing with me, HR that is, they cant do anything about it because that is the way its worked out.


The way to calculate a weeks pay is 7/365th, rather than using working days because each year varies between 260 - 262 working days. So I wonder if someone in HR has misunderstood this and taken it to how to work out a days pay. As far as I am aware, the way to work out a days pay is:
Annual / 365 *7 / Number of days worked per week.
So for you, £39k is £149.59 a day (well £149.58904 but rounding up is better for you)