Great marketing and perception, it works for Apple and it works for NV.
Sad but very true.

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Great marketing and perception, it works for Apple and it works for NV.

6950-£200
6950-£187
£387 6950>70 CrossFire that kicked the utter **** out of the £480 580 at time of purchase.
£400 7950 CrossFire@1200MHz(and 7 AAA games) that kicked the utter **** out of Titan
Sold them and £20 got me a £320 290>290X=Titan.
On the OP topic of Liquid Cooling, ASETEK might be devleoping an Nvidia AIO cooled GPU as well..
Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 ‘Vesuvius-Like’ AIO Liquid Cooled Reference Edition from ASETEK Spotted
Read more: http://wccftech.com/gtx-980-water-cooled-aio-bundle-spotted/#ixzz3EeaKZRCD
![]()
the water block is way too large and out of perspective.The price is what the market is willing to pay. What may be 'expensive' to somebody is not a large sum of money to other people. You have to bear that in mind when you're factoring in whether somebody considers a purchase a good deal or good value for money. Money is all relative after all. I'm not rich but I live well enough and have worked hard since I left uni and got a couple of decent breaks along the way.
Obviously if I was, say, working in a call centre or something for a bit over minimum wage then £500 for a GPU would probably not be considered a bargain.
Right, so you're saying it only matters if it's compute performance that affected?
Crippling a card in another way is fine, but compute performance (which is used massively in gaming is it?) is when it becomes a problem? Seems a really narrow argument with parameters defined so tightly that it can only be applied to this one scenario.
Since the Titan is the only one with the added compute performance doesn't it seem more like it's something added to that card rather than removed from all the others?
Preferring one brand over another is a different and perfectly valid argument.
You might buy a Bugatti Veyron for $1.000.000 instead of an $850.000 Porsche 918 Spider if you think its better.
If you but the Veyron simply because its more expensive, then i would argue its not really a valid reason.
The price is what the market is willing to pay. What may be 'expensive' to somebody is not a large sum of money to other people. You have to bear that in mind when you're factoring in whether somebody considers a purchase a good deal or good value for money. Money is all relative after all. I'm not rich but I live well enough and have worked hard since I left uni and got a couple of decent breaks along the way.
Obviously if I was, say, working in a call centre or something for a bit over minimum wage then £500 for a GPU would probably not be considered a bargain.
Whatever it is I'm not interested

Preferring one brand over another is a different and perfectly valid argument.
You might buy a Bugatti Veyron for $1.000.000 instead of an $850.000 Porsche 918 Spider if you think its better.
If you buy the Veyron simply because its more expensive, then i would argue its not really a valid reason.
Its not "added compute performance" it was there originally, they took it away and told you "if you want it back give me a bucket load of money"
Even though I could afford Titan it's just a ridiculous amount for a single gpu. Bang for buck is what I am after which Nvidia unfortunately have never gave me for quite a while.
Even though I could afford Titan it's just a ridiculous amount for a single gpu. Bang for buck is what I am after which Nvidia unfortunately have never gave me for quite a while.
.snipped
Rusty0611 said:Whatever it is I'm not interested - keep the thread on topic or at the very least about graphics cards.
Or you just buy what's best for you at the time? I'm confused: everything you've said is just one big tangent to my 'money is relative' point.
The Vapor-X was considered the best bang-for-buck 290?

When I mean bang for buck I take into consideration noise, cooling performance as well if a card is not much dearer. No way I would choose a Amd ref cooler card.![]()
Tri-X?
PCS+?
February.. All good then. These cards will be old hat by time AMD release owt![]()

So i don't understand it, or perhaps its a problem for people to admit to being done over, which i can understand, but then, why keep running back to them like a battered wife?
Anyway, its always good to debate it.
Tri-X?
PCS+?