another disgusting paedophile case

estebanrey · 22 Oct 2014 at 22:38

Pawnless Endgame said:
This. The word paedophile means children i.e. age 12 or below. There's a different term for teenagers, can't remember what it's called.

Hebephilia is the attraction of pubescent individuals (11-14) and this woman is a 'Ephebophile' which is someone with a sexual interest with mid to late adolescents (15-19).

So, technically, anyone here who has watched an 18/19 year old in a porn video is the same category as the woman in question.

arc@css · 22 Oct 2014 at 22:39

Akagi · 22 Oct 2014 at 22:43

Clearly this doesn't make her a paedophile though...

It is a case. True.

Was it illegal? Yes.

Is it disgusting? Debatable.

Is she a paedo? No.

Energize · 23 Oct 2014 at 00:44

QlimaxUK said:
ephebophile

This is the correct term for this case, mid to late adolescents, normally legal in the UK expect for cases like this where there is abuse of a vulnerable person.

estebanrey said:
So, technically, anyone here who has watched an 18/19 year old in a porn video is the same category as the woman in question.

No because it's not an exclusive attraction. Studies show normal people are attracted to people in the 16+ range, but ephebophiles are exclusively attracted to people in the 15-19 range.

Efour · 23 Oct 2014 at 05:32

Niiccccccccccccccce

spoffle · 23 Oct 2014 at 05:50

OP is fail, he's definitely not being sarcastic.

kaptainmarc · 23 Oct 2014 at 06:21

what a crock of poo

17 year old gets his wick wet, most lads at that age always want to bang one of the teachers, I bet he was jumping for joy

estebanrey · 23 Oct 2014 at 09:26

Energize said:
No because it's not an exclusive attraction. Studies show normal people are attracted to people in the 16+ range, but ephebophiles are exclusively attracted to people in the 15-19 range.

So Jimmy Savile wasn't a paedophile then because he also shagged grannies?

ZXSpectrum · 23 Oct 2014 at 10:26

snips86x said:
Quote:
In Texas, despite what most people, hell, even most attorneys, will tell you, the age of consent is NOT 17. It is, in fact, 18. Let that sink in for a moment. Yes, that means an 18 yr. old high school senior who is having a sexual relationship with his 17 yr. old girlfriend is breaking the law and committing a felony!

This is not strictly true. And yes I did hear about it when I watched the new Transformers film.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape#Romeo_and_Juliet_laws

Flying_Hellfish · 23 Oct 2014 at 10:34

Probably shouldn't have bragged tbh.

Probably an abuse of power from the teacher but at 17 I reckon most lads could make their own decisions.

~>Dg<~ · 23 Oct 2014 at 10:34

talk about misuse of the word.

lad of 17 had sex with a 24 women. standard tbh. it just happens to be a teacher.