Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 9,583
Surely in gear and on a hill with no throttle you'd slow down, so then you would put your foot on the throttle?
There IS a difference, but only during certain conditions, i.e cornering hard, braking whilst cornering, braking harshly in the wet etc... that's why average joe buys cheap tires.

With cars that have over run cut off, don't they still have to supply a small amount of fuel in each cycle?
So if you're engine breaking at 4000 rpm, it would still use more than freewheeling at 800 rpm?
(in a Honda b series engine)
My Conti's are definitely, obviously and demonstrably better than the cheap tyres I had before... (A couple of Events, a Jinyu and a Wanli)
You must have to be a total muppet to think that a £35 tyre is as good as an £85 tyre. If that were the case, there wouldn't be any £85 tyres...


Highlighted is the operative bit. Would an older car with less sophisticated engine management computer or a carburettor would still use fuel on the overrun?
You're right about tires (when it comes to something that's crucial in keeping control of a car, "the cheapest one possible" really shouldn't be the criterion for which one to buy), but your supporting argument is wrong and a bit daft considering how common it is for people to pay much higher prices because of fashion and advertising.

Evening all,
After what turned into a rather heated debate at lunch today at work (lord knows why) it got me wondering the following :
Is it just the older generation that don't understand the concept of an engine using no fuel on the overrun whilst in gear or do many people assume that the engine constantly uses fuel? One person piped up and said where do the valves get the lead they require.. I asked him if a clue was that petrol was now called unleaded and he wasn't best impressed.
/
Rolling down a hill with the car in gear and no throttle is an example of overrun. A modern engine will be using no fuel in this situation.
)
I have some Conti's 3yrs old and they had all cracked on the groves .Each tyre had 3 rings of cracks all the way round them.I only did under 9k on them. To replace them was £85 a tyre. So I bought some Landsail tyres which had a double C rating. Better Rating than the Conti's and only £40 a tyre fitted
One happy muppet![]()

Rating /= real world performance
Hell I once bought a car with budget Diamondback tyres fitted and had them changed the next day because they were outright dangerous in the wet, they would spin under normal acceleration lol.
It's nothing to do with age, and everything to do with dumb people doing dumb things

Driven well within the speed limit, like 'normal' people who simply drive to the shops and back no one is going to notice the difference between a cheap tire and an expensive one, that's my point. If you drove like a granny then you'd not be able to tell the difference either, but because you're into cars and drive them enthusiastically then you notice the difference.
I'd bet even people who drive like grannies occasionally have to brake hard in wet conditions, where the difference between budget and premium tyres is immediately obvious.