Typo, I think it's clear I know who murph is considering the first line, or did you skip over that,
A lot of your posts are bursting with "typos" which can make them incredibly hard to read. You really should put more effort in.
Typo, I think it's clear I know who murph is considering the first line, or did you skip over that,
Seems the several who jumped on me, are having to rethink as more people post, saying it was nonsense or didn't notice it.
Sorry... but don't you think the concept of a trans-dimensional being manipulating the one element (love) that transcends dimensions to guide humans into making specific decisions to save human kind a little bit impressive?
Remember you aren't just witnessing the characters on the screen but the series of events that have been put forth by future "human" kind.
People complaining about the sound, did you view it in a proper Imax cinema? The bfi in Waterloo had impeccable sound.
Of which both statements are wrong.
murph was told to do it scientifically, hence the note book etc.
Amelia, only had one choice left. Three planets, they had already visited two plants. One left.
So no you are still making no sense.
Internet forum is not the place to discuss this kind of thing unless you love being ridiculed.Jumped on you? I thought you were "perfectly in control" but if you honestly thought someone engaging in a discussion was 'jumping on you' then that's hardly the mindset of someone in control.
You're baiting for further information but I don't know what additional information you need over what I'd already explained about my understanding.
So if we're to believe that love is an element that transcends dimensions then that serves as a brilliant tool for these trans-dimentional beings to influence and hence guide the characters into making the correct decisions. Like I'd mentioned before;
- specifically influencing Murph to seek her room for messages
- influencing the specific astronaut trained to choose the correct planet (Amelia) to travel to the correct planet

I'd definitely agree with you trentlad. It's was a powerful film about love. So much so the scene where they showed the 23 years worth of messages. I teared up, and I'm usually devoid of emotion as a human being. It was a powerful tool to remind them, though it has been 23 years, they need to make what they do count, for those they love back home. And a big message to us the viewer that time so precious and don't let it slip, because what you think can be minutes, ends up being years, and we never end up living in the moment with those that make life worth living.

I didn't realise there was a wrong or right answer here. The whole concept of a theory is it's potential to be correct rather than being solid fact.
What did Murph's scientific approach have to do with her recognising that her father was sending her messages and to visit the room at that specific moment in time?
Amelia was denied her original choice. Her ability to make the correct decision was revoked, but she was specifically trained to be the astronaut to make that decision. If Cooper hadn't suspected the connection between her and Edmunds then he wouldn't have interfered with the element (love) that was being used to guide them to the correct decision.
I didn't realise there was a wrong or right answer here. The whole concept of a theory is it's potential to be correct rather than being solid fact.
What did Murph's scientific approach have to do with her recognising that her father was sending her messages and to visit the room at that specific moment in time?
Amelia was denied her original choice. Her ability to make the correct decision was revoked, but she was specifically trained to be the astronaut to make that decision. If Cooper hadn't suspected the connection between her and Edmunds then he wouldn't have interfered with the element (love) that was being used to guide them to the correct decision.
I don't think Amelia was using love as a correct decision, I think she just made up a load of spiel to get what she wanted. Which is why I wonder why people are seeing it as some sort of working theory, in a science based film.
You've asked me to elaborate so let me extend you the same courtesy.
Glaucus, read Castiel's post a few posts up. That's what the film is about.

Simply, no.
You've asked me to elaborate so let me extend you the same courtesy.