No i didn't. what i said was:
Stop twisting facts.
Just because DX ran like that for you doesn't mean it will for everyone on the same setup.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
No i didn't. what i said was:
Stop twisting facts.

Just because DX ran like that for you doesn't mean it will for everyone on the same setup.
Just because DX ran like that for you doesn't mean it will for everyone on the same setup.
What about the facts that people still have issues with Mantle and no matter what can't get it working without crashing, memory leaks etc etc? It's all well and good pointing out the positives but it still has its issues with BF4 for some people.
Why did he need a video of it when he has the setup himself? Surely he knows how well it runs? That video shows nothing about how DX would run on a 970 if he switched, you can't say it would be the same at all.

The OP has the 290, if he was having an issue with Mantle in BF4 he would know it already.![]()
also at 1080 the 970 is faster
at higher res the 290x can be quicker but not at the video which is 1080![]()
What about the facts that people still have issues with Mantle and no matter what can't get it working without crashing, memory leaks etc etc? It's all well and good pointing out the positives but it still has its issues with BF4 for some people.
Why did he need a video of it when he has the setup himself? Surely he knows how well it runs? That video shows nothing about how DX would run on a 970 if he switched, you can't say it would be the same at all.
What is your advice to the op?
very much so, depending on the developers and which gpu vendor they're in bed with for that game, and tbh they're worse than swingers.It's not faster, they both have there games they favour.
Isn't a 970 @1.5 around same performance as 290 @1.2
On this site it's hard to get a good comparison of each cards performance because everyone overclock the nuts of them.
But the fact is they nothing in it.

What about the facts that people still have issues with Mantle and no matter what can't get it working without crashing, memory leaks etc etc? It's all well and good pointing out the positives but it still has its issues with BF4 for some people.
Why did he need a video of it when he has the setup himself? Surely he knows how well it runs? That video shows nothing about how DX would run on a 970 if he switched, you can't say it would be the same at all.
Which makes the video even more pointless.
People always present specific scenarios or graphs like gospel, fact is there's many variables.
No it makes your comment all the more pointless, as most people do not have a side by side comparison which is better than one after the other comparison.
Stick with the 290 if he's happy with it and definitely don't take advice from completely one sided fanboys. I'm well aware how good Mantle is but nobody even asked OP what games he plays or is planning on getting. I doubt he's going to be playing BF4 forever.
Any plans on a new CPU soon manering?
You obviously don't know what a spoilt brat is.
You're about as AMD as it gets with the exception of pre hired Matt.
OP already knew that? He can test it perfectly himself lol.